Literature DB >> 20579797

Use of biomedical obstetric care in rural Tanzania: the role of social and material inequalities.

Sydney A Spangler1, Shelah S Bloom.   

Abstract

Despite over 20 years of efforts to improve maternal health, complications of pregnancy and childbirth continue to threaten women's lives in many countries of sub-Saharan Africa. To reduce maternal mortality levels and achieve Millennium Development Goal Five, institutions working for safe motherhood are committed to making biomedical obstetric care more available to women during childbirth. However, implementation of this strategy is not reaching women at the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum for reasons that are not well understood. Using data from fieldwork conducted between September 2007 and June 2008, this study examines women's use of biomedical obstetric care in two rural districts of south-central Tanzania where this care was being supplied. Specifically, it seeks to explain how social and material inequalities affect decisions and behaviors related to childbirth. In addressing this aim we employed a mixed-methods study design. Effects of sociodemographic characteristics on obstetric care use were examined with logistic regression analysis (n = 1150), while perspectives and experiences of childbearing women were explored with participant observation and in-depth interviews (n = 48). The results from quantitative and qualitative study components were interpreted in light of each other. Statistically significant social and material factors related to use of care included ethnicity, education, parity, and household assets. Qualitative themes involved physical, economic, and social access to health facilities as well as issues of risk perception and self-identity. The overall findings suggest that use of obstetric care is influenced by a complex interplay of factors closely tied to relative status in family and community. As individual agents differentially positioned by multiple markers of power, women pragmatically negotiate amidst a wide array of deterrents and motivators to secure the best care they can. In order to improve use of biomedical obstetric care, interventions aimed at increasing availability of these services should focus on improving access for women who are disadvantaged. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579797     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  28 in total

Review 1.  How far is mixed methods research in the field of health policy and systems in Africa? A scoping review.

Authors:  M De Allegri; I Sieleunou; G A Abiiro; V Ridde
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.344

2.  "It's up to the woman's people": how social factors influence facility-based delivery in Rural Northern Ghana.

Authors:  Cheryl A Moyer; Philip B Adongo; Raymond A Aborigo; Abraham Hodgson; Cyril M Engmann; Raymond DeVries
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

3.  Timing of antenatal care for adolescent and adult pregnant women in south-eastern Tanzania.

Authors:  Karin Gross; Sandra Alba; Tracy R Glass; Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg; Brigit Obrist
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 4.  Ethical, Legal, and Sociocultural Issues in the Use of Mobile Technologies and Call Detail Records Data for Public Health in the East African Region: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Juliet Nabbuye Sekandi; Kenya Murray; Corinne Berryman; Paula Davis-Olwell; Caroline Hurst; Robert Kakaire; Noah Kiwanuka; Christopher C Whalen; Erisa Sabakaki Mwaka
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 5.  Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Mannava; K Durrant; J Fisher; M Chersich; S Luchters
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 6.  Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Meghan A Bohren; Erin C Hunter; Heather M Munthe-Kaas; João Paulo Souza; Joshua P Vogel; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro Region, Tanzania.

Authors:  Shannon A McMahon; Asha S George; Joy J Chebet; Idda H Mosha; Rose N M Mpembeni; Peter J Winch
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  "You should go so that others can come"; the role of facilities in determining an early departure after childbirth in Morogoro Region, Tanzania.

Authors:  Shannon A McMahon; Diwakar Mohan; Amnesty E LeFevre; Idda Mosha; Rose Mpembeni; Rachel P Chase; Abdullah H Baqui; Peter J Winch
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cheryl A Moyer; Aesha Mustafa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Efficiency of antenatal care and childbirth services in selected primary health care facilities in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Happiness P Saronga; Els Duysburgh; Siriel Massawe; Maxwell A Dalaba; Germain Savadogo; Pencho Tonchev; Hengjin Dong; Rainer Sauerborn; Svetla Loukanova
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.