BACKGROUND: Mass spectrometry (MS) based protein profiling has become one of the key technologies in biomedical research and biomarker discovery. One bottleneck in MS-based protein analysis is sample preparation and an efficient fractionation step to reduce the complexity of the biological samples, which are too complex to be analyzed directly with MS. Sample preparation strategies that reduce the complexity of tryptic digests by using immunoaffinity based methods have shown to lead to a substantial increase in throughput and sensitivity in the proteomic mass spectrometry approach. The limitation of using such immunoaffinity-based approaches is the availability of the appropriate peptide specific capture antibodies. Recent developments in these approaches, where subsets of peptides with short identical terminal sequences can be enriched using antibodies directed against short terminal epitopes, promise a significant gain in efficiency. RESULTS: We show that the minimal set of terminal epitopes for the coverage of a target protein list can be found by the formulation as a set cover problem, preceded by a filtering pipeline for the exclusion of peptides and target epitopes with undesirable properties. CONCLUSIONS: For small datasets (a few hundred proteins) it is possible to solve the problem to optimality with moderate computational effort using commercial or free solvers. Larger datasets, like full proteomes require the use of heuristics.
BACKGROUND: Mass spectrometry (MS) based protein profiling has become one of the key technologies in biomedical research and biomarker discovery. One bottleneck in MS-based protein analysis is sample preparation and an efficient fractionation step to reduce the complexity of the biological samples, which are too complex to be analyzed directly with MS. Sample preparation strategies that reduce the complexity of tryptic digests by using immunoaffinity based methods have shown to lead to a substantial increase in throughput and sensitivity in the proteomic mass spectrometry approach. The limitation of using such immunoaffinity-based approaches is the availability of the appropriate peptide specific capture antibodies. Recent developments in these approaches, where subsets of peptides with short identical terminal sequences can be enriched using antibodies directed against short terminal epitopes, promise a significant gain in efficiency. RESULTS: We show that the minimal set of terminal epitopes for the coverage of a target protein list can be found by the formulation as a set cover problem, preceded by a filtering pipeline for the exclusion of peptides and target epitopes with undesirable properties. CONCLUSIONS: For small datasets (a few hundred proteins) it is possible to solve the problem to optimality with moderate computational effort using commercial or free solvers. Larger datasets, like full proteomes require the use of heuristics.
Authors: N Leigh Anderson; Norman G Anderson; Lee R Haines; Darryl B Hardie; Robert W Olafson; Terry W Pearson Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: N Leigh Anderson; Norman G Anderson; Terry W Pearson; Christoph H Borchers; Amanda G Paulovich; Scott D Patterson; Michael Gillette; Ruedi Aebersold; Steven A Carr Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2009-01-07 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Gordon R Nicol; Mark Han; Jun Kim; Charles E Birse; Erin Brand; Anh Nguyen; Mehdi Mesri; William FitzHugh; Patrick Kaminker; Paul A Moore; Steven M Ruben; Tao He Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Sonja Volk; Thomas D Schreiber; David Eisen; Calvin Wiese; Hannes Planatscher; Christopher J Pynn; Dieter Stoll; Markus F Templin; Thomas O Joos; Oliver Pötz Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Sibylle Hoeppe; Thomas D Schreiber; Hannes Planatscher; Andreas Zell; Markus F Templin; Dieter Stoll; Thomas O Joos; Oliver Poetz Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Niclas Olsson; Christer Wingren; Mikael Mattsson; Peter James; David O'Connell; Fredrik Nilsson; Dolores J Cahill; Carl A K Borrebaeck Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Frederik Weiß; Anke Schnabel; Hannes Planatscher; Bart H J van den Berg; Bettina Serschnitzki; Andreas K Nuessler; Wolfgang E Thasler; Thomas S Weiss; Matthias Reuss; Dieter Stoll; Markus F Templin; Thomas O Joos; Katrin Marcus; Oliver Poetz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Heike Sprenger; Josef Daniel Rasinger; Helen Hammer; Wael Naboulsi; Elke Zabinsky; Hannes Planatscher; Michael Schwarz; Oliver Poetz; Albert Braeuning Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 6.168