BACKGROUND: A method of individually assessing former exposure to asbestos fibres is a precondition of risk-differentiated health surveillance. The main aims of our study were to assess former levels of airborne asbestos exposure in the power industry in Germany and to propose a basic strategy for health surveillance and the early detection of asbestos related diseases. METHODS: Between March 2002 and the end of 2006, we conducted a retrospective questionnaire based survey of occupational tasks and exposures with airborne asbestos fibres in a cohort of 8632 formerly asbestos exposed power industry workers. The data on exposure and occupation were entered into a specially designed computer programme, based on ambient monitoring of airborne asbestos fibre concentrations. The cumulative asbestos exposure was expressed as the product of the eight-hour time weighted average and the total duration of exposure in fibre years (fibres/cubic centimetre-years). RESULTS: Data of 7775 (90% of the total) participants working in installations for power generation, power distribution or gas supply could be evaluated. The power generation group (n = 5284) had a mean age of 56 years, were exposed for 20 years and had an average cumulative asbestos exposure of 42 fibre years. The occupational group of "metalworkers" (n = 1600) had the highest mean value of 79 fibre years. The corresponding results for the power distribution group (n = 2491) were a mean age of 45 years, a mean exposure duration of 12 years and an average cumulative asbestos exposure of only 2.5 fibre years. The gas supply workers (n = 512) had a mean age of 54 years and a mean duration of exposure of 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: While the surveyed cohort as a whole was heavily exposed to asbestos dust, the power distribution group had a mean cumulative exposure of only 6% of that found in the power generation group. Based on the presented data, risk-differentiated disease surveillance focusing on metalworkers and electricians from the power generating industry seems justified. That combined with a sensitive examination technique would allow detecting asbestos related diseases early and efficiently.
BACKGROUND: A method of individually assessing former exposure to asbestos fibres is a precondition of risk-differentiated health surveillance. The main aims of our study were to assess former levels of airborne asbestos exposure in the power industry in Germany and to propose a basic strategy for health surveillance and the early detection of asbestos related diseases. METHODS: Between March 2002 and the end of 2006, we conducted a retrospective questionnaire based survey of occupational tasks and exposures with airborne asbestos fibres in a cohort of 8632 formerly asbestos exposed power industry workers. The data on exposure and occupation were entered into a specially designed computer programme, based on ambient monitoring of airborne asbestos fibre concentrations. The cumulative asbestos exposure was expressed as the product of the eight-hour time weighted average and the total duration of exposure in fibre years (fibres/cubic centimetre-years). RESULTS: Data of 7775 (90% of the total) participants working in installations for power generation, power distribution or gas supply could be evaluated. The power generation group (n = 5284) had a mean age of 56 years, were exposed for 20 years and had an average cumulative asbestos exposure of 42 fibre years. The occupational group of "metalworkers" (n = 1600) had the highest mean value of 79 fibre years. The corresponding results for the power distribution group (n = 2491) were a mean age of 45 years, a mean exposure duration of 12 years and an average cumulative asbestos exposure of only 2.5 fibre years. The gas supply workers (n = 512) had a mean age of 54 years and a mean duration of exposure of 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: While the surveyed cohort as a whole was heavily exposed to asbestos dust, the power distribution group had a mean cumulative exposure of only 6% of that found in the power generation group. Based on the presented data, risk-differentiated disease surveillance focusing on metalworkers and electricians from the power generating industry seems justified. That combined with a sensitive examination technique would allow detecting asbestos related diseases early and efficiently.
Authors: E Orlowski; H Pohlabeln; F Berrino; W Ahrens; U Bolm-Audorff; K Grossgarten; Y Iwatsubo; K H Jöckel; P Brochard Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 1993 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Rūta Petrauskaite Everatt; Grazina Smolianskiene; Antti Tossavainen; Saulius Cicenas; Remigijus Jankauskas Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Naransukh Damiran; Khishigtogtokh Davaajav; Erdenechimeg Erdenebayar; Burmaa Gomboloi; Arthur L Frank Journal: Int J Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-01-13
Authors: Michael K Felten; Khaled Khatab; Lars Knoll; Thomas Schettgen; Hendrik Müller-Berndorff; Thomas Kraus Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Naransukh Damiran; Ellen K Silbergeld; Arthur L Frank; Oyuntogos Lkhasuren; Chimedsuren Ochir; Patrick N Breysse Journal: Int J Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-03-02
Authors: Zara Rajput; Kurt Georg Hering; Thomas Kraus; Andrea Tannapfel; Günter Sonnenschein; Alexandra Centmayer; Katja Radon; Dennis Nowak; Tobias Weinmann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Christian Eisenhawer; Michael K Felten; Miriam Tamm; Marco Das; Thomas Kraus Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Michael K Felten; Lars Knoll; Christian Schikowsky; Marco Das; Christian Feldhaus; Kurt G Hering; Alfred Böcking; Thomas Kraus Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 2.646