Literature DB >> 20579209

Womens' opinions on intrapartal care: development of a theory-based questionnaire.

Bodil Wilde-Larsson1, Gerry Larsson, Linda J Kvist, Ann-Kristin Sandin-Bojö.   

Abstract

AIM: To develop a patient questionnaire specific to intrapartal care, based on the theoretical foundation of the general instrument Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP).
BACKGROUND: Existing general patient questionnaires do not take intrapartal care aspects fully into account, and available intrapartal-specific patient questionnaires tend to have a weak theoretical foundation.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional, nationwide study carried out during a two-week period in 2007 at Swedish maternity units.
METHOD: An intrapartal-specific QPP-questionnaire (QPP-I) was developed by combining a selection of 22 items from the short and long versions of the QPP with 10 newly constructed items. Responses were obtained from 739 women (63% response rate). The dimensionality of the QPP-I was assessed using structural equation modelling (a nested factor model). Non-parametric statistics were used for subgroup comparisons.
RESULTS: A nested model with a general factor including all 32 items and 10 subordinate factors was developed. Most scales had acceptable reliability coefficients (0.73-0.93), and a meaningful pattern of subgroup differences was obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: The QPP-I is theory based and has its roots in a patient perspective. It was developed using a nationwide sample of Swedish women receiving intrapartal care, and an advanced statistical method was used. The outcome of this initial empirical trial was promising but needs to be tested in different countries and cultures. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: By combining womens' responses on perceived reality and subjective importance ascribed to the various aspects of care measured, the QPP-I offers the care provider better guidelines on which elements to focus quality improvement work on, than would be the case if only a rank order of perceived reality ratings was available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579209     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03055.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review.

Authors:  Alexandra Sawyer; Susan Ayers; Jane Abbott; Gillian Gyte; Heike Rabe; Lelia Duley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument.

Authors:  Anna Dencker; Charles Taft; Liselotte Bergqvist; Håkan Lilja; Marie Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Measuring parents' experiences and satisfaction with care during very preterm birth: a questionnaire development study.

Authors:  A Sawyer; H Rabe; J Abbott; G Gyte; L Duley; S Ayers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Childbirth experience questionnaire: validating its use in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Kate F Walker; Philippa Wilson; George J Bugg; Anna Dencker; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Good practices according to WHO's recommendation for normal labor and birth and women's assessment of the care received: the "birth in Brazil" national research study, 2011/2012.

Authors:  Marcia Leonardi Baldisserotto; Mariza Miranda Theme Filha; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Experiences of ICU survivors in a low middle income country- a multicenter study.

Authors:  Lalitha Pieris; Ponsuge Chathurani Sigera; Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De Silva; Sithum Munasinghe; Aasiyah Rashan; Priyantha Lakmini Athapattu; Kosala Saroj Amarasiri Jayasinghe; Kerstein Samarasinghe; Abi Beane; Arjen M Dondorp; Rashan Haniffa
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Patients' perceptions of palliative care: adaptation of the Quality from the Patient's Perspective instrument for use in palliative care, and description of patients' perceptions of care received.

Authors:  Tuva Sandsdalen; Ingrid Rystedt; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Reidun Hov; Sevald Høye; Bodil Wilde-Larsson
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Perceived quality of physiotherapist-led orthopaedic triage compared with standard practice in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karin S Samsson; Susanne Bernhardsson; Maria E H Larsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The relationships between the combination of person- and organization-related conditions and patients' perceptions of palliative care quality.

Authors:  Tuva Sandsdalen; Sevald Høye; Ingrid Rystedt; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Reidun Hov; Bodil Wilde-Larsson
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Methodological development of tools to measure how women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: labor observation and community survey.

Authors:  Meghan A Bohren; Joshua P Vogel; Bukola Fawole; Ernest T Maya; Thae Maung Maung; Mamadou Diouldé Baldé; Agnes A Oyeniran; Modupe Ogunlade; Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh; Nwe Oo Mon; Boubacar Alpha Diallo; Abou Bangoura; Richard Adanu; Sihem Landoulsi; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Özge Tunçalp
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.