Literature DB >> 20579179

Carry-over effects reveal reproductive costs in a long-distance migrant.

Richard Inger1, Xavier A Harrison, Graeme D Ruxton, Jason Newton, Kendrew Colhoun, Gudmundur A Gudmundsson, Graham McElwaine, Matthew Pickford, David Hodgson, Stuart Bearhop.   

Abstract

1. It has been known for some time that the consequences of 'decisions' made at one point in an animal's life may not always be borne immediately. For example, numerous studies have demonstrated the trade-off between current and future breeding success across multiple taxa. 2. It is becoming increasingly clear that such processes may also operate among seasons, such that the conditions experienced at one point in the annual cycle may have significant downstream impacts, or 'carry-over effects', and this is particularly evident among migratory species. We might therefore predict that certain combinations of reproductive and migratory strategy could lead to profound carry-over effects. However, the extent to which these phenomena might generate variation in fitness within a population is unclear. 3. Here, we investigate how winter habitat selection in a long-distance migrant, with extended parental care (the Light-bellied Brent goose) is influenced by parental status and how this has a counterintuitive effect on subsequent breeding success. 4. Dominant individuals and groups generally monopolize the best quality resources. In the case of geese, families are dominant; however, our findings highlight a hidden cost to raising a family. Stable isotope analysis demonstrates that later in the non-breeding season, adults with families utilize lower quality resources than non-breeders. This is probably caused by parents being constrained in habitat choice by the lower foraging efficiency of their juveniles. Consequently, parental adults end the winter in poorer condition than non-breeders. 5. We further demonstrate that parents in one year are less likely than expected to breed again in the next year and suggest that this is caused by conditions during the non-breeding period being carried over into the breeding season. In conclusion, we demonstrate previously hidden costs to raising a family, which are likely to be important in terms of life-history evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579179     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01712.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  23 in total

Review 1.  An ontogenetic perspective on individual differences.

Authors:  Nathan R Senner; Jesse R Conklin; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Within- and between-year variations of reproductive strategy and cost in a population of Siberian chipmunks.

Authors:  Christie Le Coeur; Benoît Pisanu; Jean-Louis Chapuis; Alexandre Robert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Measures of oxidative state are primarily driven by extrinsic factors in a long-distance migrant.

Authors:  Thomas W Bodey; Ian R Cleasby; Jonathan D Blount; Freydis Vigfusdottir; Kerry Mackie; Stuart Bearhop
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Integrated population models reveal local weather conditions are the key drivers of population dynamics in an aerial insectivore.

Authors:  Mitch D Weegman; Todd W Arnold; Russell D Dawson; David W Winkler; Robert G Clark
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The ghost of social environments past: dominance relationships include current interactions and experience carried over from previous groups.

Authors:  Colby J Tanner; Gul Deniz Salali; Andrew L Jackson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Seasonal interactions in the black-legged kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla: links between breeding performance and winter distribution.

Authors:  Maria I Bogdanova; Francis Daunt; Mark Newell; Richard A Phillips; Michael P Harris; Sarah Wanless
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Costs of reproduction and migration are paid in later return to the colony, not in physical condition, in a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  Marie Claire Gatt; Maaike Versteegh; Christina Bauch; B Irene Tieleman; José Pedro Granadeiro; Paulo Catry
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  High activity before breeding improves reproductive performance by enhancing mitochondrial function and biogenesis.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhang; Adam L Brasher; Noel R Park; Halie A Taylor; Andreas N Kavazis; Wendy R Hood
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Feather and faecal corticosterone concentrations predict future reproductive decisions in harlequin ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus).

Authors:  Warren K Hansen; Lisa J Bate; Devin W Landry; Olivier Chastel; Charline Parenteau; Creagh W Breuner
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Hatching date influences winter habitat occupancy: Examining seasonal interactions across the full annual cycle in a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Michael E Akresh; David I King; Peter P Marra
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.