Literature DB >> 20579132

Sources and migration of volatile organic compounds in mixed-use buildings.

C Jia1, S Batterman, C Godwin, S Charles, J-Y Chin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We examined concentrations and migration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ten mixed-use buildings in southeast Michigan, USA. In an office and work zone in each building, air exchange rates (AERs) were measured using perfluorocarbon tracers, and over 96 VOC species were measured by GC/MS over a 7-day period. VOCs were then apportioned to sources in offices, work zones, and outdoors using a two-zone mass balance model. AERs averaged 3.9 h (0.2-14.2 h) in offices and 1.9 h (0.4-3.5 h) in work zones. The dominant VOCs included aromatics, terpenes and alkanes. VOC concentrations were uniform in the smaller spaces, and more variable in some of the very large spaces. Apportionments depended on the VOC and building, but emissions in industrial zones of buildings often migrated to office areas where they frequently accounted for the bulk of VOC concentrations. Outdoor sources accounted for most benzene and carbon tetrachloride, and a small fraction of aromatic and aliphatic compounds. This study shows that pollutant migration can be a significant and not uncommon problem in mixed-use buildings, and it demonstrates the need for better control of emissions and pollutant migration. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Pollutant exposures in industrial, commercial, and institutional buildings arise from indoor and outdoor sources that can be identified, apportioned, and controlled with knowledge of emission sources and building airflows. We show that multi-tracer techniques are an effective and practical means of determining airflows and exchange rates in large buildings. In examining a set of mixed-use buildings, a substantial fraction of VOC exposures in otherwise relatively 'clean' offices is due to pollutant migration from 'dirty' zones of the building. This indicates the need for corrective actions to minimize exposures of office workers that are unwanted and probably unknown to building managers. These actions should include better control of emissions, isolation or control of air and pollutant flows between building zones, and documentation of the effectiveness of such measures when strong emission sources are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20579132     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  4 in total

1.  Particulate matter in the indoor and outdoor air of a gymnasium and a fronton.

Authors:  Célia Alves; Ana I Calvo; Liliana Marques; Amaya Castro; Teresa Nunes; Esther Coz; Roberto Fraile
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Air change rates and interzonal flows in residences, and the need for multi-zone models for exposure and health analyses.

Authors:  Liuliu Du; Stuart Batterman; Christopher Godwin; Jo-Yu Chin; Edith Parker; Michael Breen; Wilma Brakefield; Thomas Robins; Toby Lewis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Variability of Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC) in the Indoor Air of Retail Stores.

Authors:  Chunrong Jia; Kevin Cao; Riya Valaulikar; Xianqiang Fu; Anna Bess Sorin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Using Real Time Measurements to Derive the Indoor and Outdoor Contributions of Submicron Particulate Species and Trace Gases.

Authors:  Evdokia Stratigou; Sébastien Dusanter; Joel Brito; Emmanuel Tison; Véronique Riffault
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.