Literature DB >> 20578829

Early removal of central venous catheter in patients with candidemia does not improve outcome: analysis of 842 patients from 2 randomized clinical trials.

Marcio Nucci1, Elias Anaissie, Robert F Betts, Bertrand F Dupont, Chunzhang Wu, Donald N Buell, Laura Kovanda, Olivier Lortholary.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with candidemia frequently have a central venous catheter (CVC) in place, and its early removal is considered the standard of care.
METHODS: We performed a subgroup analysis of 2 phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials of candidemia to examine the effects of early CVC removal (within 24 or 48 h after treatment initiation) on the outcomes of 842 patients with candidemia. Inclusion criteria were candidemia, age >16 years, CVC at diagnosis, and receipt of 1 dose of the study drug. Six outcomes were evaluated: treatment success, rates of persistent and recurrent candidemia, time to mycological eradication, and survival at 28 and 42 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, controlling for potential confounders.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis, early CVC removal did not improve time to mycological eradication or rates of persistent or recurrent candidemia but was associated with better treatment success and survival. These benefits were lost in multivariate analysis, which failed to show any beneficial effect of early CVC removal on all 6 outcomes and identified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, older age, and persistent neutropenia as the most significant variables. Our findings were consistent across all outcomes and time points (removal within 24 or 48 h and survival at 28 and 42 days). The median time to eradication of candidemia was similar between the 2 study groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 842 adults with candidemia followed up prospectively, early CVC removal was not associated with any clinical benefit. These findings suggest an evidence-based re-evaluation of current treatment recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578829     DOI: 10.1086/653935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  55 in total

1.  Assessing responses to treatment of opportunistic mycoses and salvage strategies.

Authors:  Baldeep Wirk; John R Wingard
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Prevalence of, and risk factors for, hematogenous fungal endophthalmitis in patients with Candida bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Hideaki Kato; Yukihiro Yoshimura; Yoshihiro Suido; Kazuo Ide; Yoshifumi Sugiyama; Kasumi Matsuno; Hideaki Nakajima
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Micafungin at physiological serum concentrations shows antifungal activity against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms.

Authors:  M Guembe; J Guinea; L J Marcos-Zambrano; A Fernández-Cruz; T Peláez; P Muñoz; E Bouza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antifungal clinical trials and guidelines: what we know and do not know.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  Catheter retention as a consequence rather than a cause of unfavorable outcome in candidemia.

Authors:  Lauro Damonti; Véronique Erard; Jorge Garbino; Jacques Schrenzel; Stefan Zimmerli; Konrad Mühlethaler; Alexander Imhof; Reinhard Zbinden; Jan Fehr; Katia Boggian; Thomas Bruderer; Ursula Flückiger; Reno Frei; Christina Orasch; Anna Conen; Nina Khanna; Thomas Bregenzer; Jacques Bille; Frédéric Lamoth; Oscar Marchetti; Pierre-Yves Bochud
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Diagnostic usefulness of differential time to positivity for catheter-related candidemia.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Park; Mi Suk Lee; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Heungsup Sung; Mi-Na Kim; Yang Soo Kim; Jun Hee Woo; Sung-Han Kim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Novel antifungal drugs against fungal pathogens: do they provide promising results for treatment?

Authors:  Habip Gedik; Funda Şimşek; Taner Yıldırmak; Arzu Kantürk; Deniz Arıca; Demet Aydın; Naciye Demirel; Osman Yokuş
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Analyzing candidemia guideline adherence identifies opportunities for antifungal stewardship.

Authors:  Sibylle C Mellinghoff; Pia Hartmann; Florian B Cornely; Laura Knauth; Felix Köhler; Philipp Köhler; Carolin Krause; Christine Kronenberg; Sarah-Leonie Kranz; Vidya Menon; Hannah Müller; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Stefan Pützfeld; Anna Ronge; Jule Rutz; Danila Seidel; Hilmar Wisplinghoff; Oliver A Cornely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Candida species bloodstream infections in hospitalised children: A 10-year experience.

Authors:  Shannon Chan; Elizabeth D Baley; Jobayer Hossain; M Cecilia Di Pentima
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 1.954

10.  A multicenter study of septic shock due to candidemia: outcomes and predictors of mortality.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi; Filippo Ansaldi; Maria Merelli; Cecilia Trucchi; Trucchi Cecilia; Gennaro De Pascale; Ana Diaz-Martin; Roberto Luzzati; Chiara Rosin; Leonel Lagunes; Enrico Maria Trecarichi; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Brunella Posteraro; Jose Garnacho-Montero; Assunta Sartor; Jordi Rello; Giorgio Della Rocca; Massimo Antonelli; Mario Tumbarello
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.