Literature DB >> 20578092

Preliminary results of the INSPIRE trial with the novel MGuard stent system containing a protection net to prevent distal embolization.

Felipe Maia1, J Ribamar Costa, Alexandre Abizaid, Fausto Feres, Ricardo Costa, Rodolfo Staico, Dimytri Siqueira, Vinicius Esteves, Amanda Sousa, J Eduardo Sousa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the MGuard(TM) stent combining a polymer-mesh sleeve attached to the external surface of a bare-metal stent in preventing distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Distal embolization of thrombus/platelet aggregates is associated with worse immediate and long-term prognosis after PCI. Treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) and PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is often related to this complication. Although protection and aspiration devices have been shown to reduce distal embolization, they add time and cost to PCI.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients were included. Inclusion criteria were de novo lesions in SVG or native vessels with angiographic evidence of instability with potential to provoke flow disturbances and/or distal embolization. Primary endpoint included the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and TLR) up to 30 days of the procedure and TIMI flow right after the PCI.
RESULTS: Mean population age was 60.8 years with 36.7% of diabetes. Overall, 53.3% presented with ACS, and most lesions were located in SVG (16 of 30). The majority of lesions had complex morphology including the presence of thrombus (30%) and ulcer (33.3%). The MGuard stent was successfully deployed in all cases with no angiographic/clinical complications including distal embolization. Final TIMI-3/blush-3 were achieved in all cases with no MACE up to 30 days of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary evaluation, the MGuard device demonstrated excellent performance in a highly complex lesion subset, including absence of angiographic/procedural complications, and no adverse events up to 30-day FU. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578092     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

Review 1.  An update on coronary bypass graft intervention.

Authors:  Debabrata Dash
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-03-06

2.  Current State of the Art in Approaches to Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Jeremy Kong
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

3.  Saphenous vein graft interventions.

Authors:  Emmanouil S Brilakis; Michael Lee; Julinda Mehilli; Konstantinos Marmagkiolis; Josep Rodes-Cabau; Rajesh Sachdeva; Anna Kotsia; George Christopoulos; Bavana V Rangan; Atif Mohammed; Subhash Banerjee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

Review 4.  The MGuard coronary stent: safety, efficacy, and clinical utility.

Authors:  Montserrat Gracida; Rafael Romaguera; Francisco Jacobi; Joan A Gómez-Hospital; Angel Cequier
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2015-09-18

5.  Early and midterm major adverse cardiac events in patient with saphenous vein graft using direct stenting or embolic protection device stenting.

Authors:  Mohammadali Sadr-Ameli; Hossein Mousavi; Mona Heidarali; Mohsen Maadani; Yones Ghelich; Behshid Ghadrdoost
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.