Literature DB >> 20578015

Comparison of dual to single contrast bolus magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of significant coronary artery disease.

Jan G J Groothuis1, Frans P P J Kremers, Aernout M Beek, Stijn L Brinckman, Alvin C Tuinenburg, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Albert C van Rossum, Mark B M Hofman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the incremental diagnostic value of dual-bolus over single-contrast-bolus first pass magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (MR-MPI) for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 49) with suspected CAD underwent first pass adenosine stress and rest MR-MPI and invasive coronary angiography (CA). Gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) was injected with a prebolus (1 mL) and a large bolus (0.1 mmol/kg). For the single-bolus technique, the arterial input function (AIF) was obtained from the large-contrast bolus. For the dual-bolus technique, the AIF was reconstructed from the prebolus. Absolute myocardial perfusion was calculated by Fermi-model constrained deconvolution. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to investigate diagnostic accuracy of MR myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of significant CAD on CA at vessel-based analysis.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) of the minimal stress perfusion value for the detection of significant CAD using the single-bolus and dual-bolus technique was 0.85 +/- 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.93) and 0.77 +/- 0.05 (95% CI, 0.67-0.86), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this study the dual-bolus technique had no incremental diagnostic value over single-bolus technique for detection of significant CAD with the used contrast concentrations. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20578015     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

1.  An empirical method for reducing variability and complexity of myocardial perfusion quantification by dual bolus cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Neil Chatterjee; Brandon C Benefield; Kathleen R Harris; Jacob U Fluckiger; Timothy Carroll; Daniel C Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Ananth Kidambi; Steven Sourbron; Timothy A Fairbairn; Akhlaque Uddin; Sebastian Kozerke; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Federico E Mordini; Tariq Haddad; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Tracy B Lowrey; Anthony H Aletras; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01

4.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance throughout the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Ananth Kidambi; Akhlaque Uddin; Steven Sourbron; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  SHILO, a novel dual imaging approach for simultaneous HI-/LOw temporal (Low-/Hi-spatial) resolution imaging for vascular dynamic contrast enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance: numerical simulations and feasibility in the carotid arteries.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Philip M Robson; Sarayu Ramachandran; Venkatesh Mani; Melanie Kotys-Traughber; Matthew Cham; Stefan E Fischer; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy.

Authors:  James R J Foley; Ananth Kidambi; John D Biglands; Neil Maredia; Catherine J Dickinson; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.