Literature DB >> 20577908

Differentiation of normal and neoplastic bone tissue in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: validation of a semiautomated technique.

F D'Agostino1, P Dell'Aia, C C Quattrocchi, R Del Vescovo, R Setola, R F Grasso, B Beomonte Zobel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to clinically validate the accuracy of a semiautomated software tool for analysing the enhancement curve in focal malignant bone lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients affected by cancer with malignant focal bone lesions underwent dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using the following protocol: T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences (time to repeat [TR] 600 ms, time to echo [TE] 8.6 ms, field of view [FOV] 40x40 cm) before and after intravenous injection of gadolinium-containing contrast agent. Image postprocessing was performed using the software DyCoH. Each region of interest (5x5 pixels), drawn to include the area of the lesion with the highest values of the area under the curve map, was analysed to obtain time-intensity curves and relative perfusion parameters: time to peak (TTP), peak intensity (PI), slope (60-s slope), intensity at 60 s after contrast agent injection (60-s I) and final intensity (FI).
RESULTS: Data were obtained by analysing 86 malignant lesions and 86 apparently normal bone regions. PI, 60-s slope, 60-s I and FI were significantly different between neoplastic and apparently normal (p<0.001) samples. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were, respectively, 94%, 93% and 94% at a PI threshold of 100 (signal-to-noise ratio), with positive and negative predictive values of 93% and 94%. At a threshold value of 0.85 for 60-s slope, sensitivity and specificity values were both 91%.
CONCLUSIONS: The semiautomated technique we report appears to be accurate for identifying neoplastic tissue and for mapping perfusion parameters, with the added value of a consistent measurement of perfusion parameters on colour-coded maps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20577908     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0572-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  24 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  A Jackson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Seong Sook Hong; Young Jun Choi; Seong Ho Park; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: basic principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  K L Verstraete; H J Van der Woude; P C Hogendoorn; Y De-Deene; M Kunnen; J L Bloem
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mark A Zahra; Kieren G Hollingsworth; Evis Sala; David J Lomas; Li T Tan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Andrew J Dwyer; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion.

Authors:  K L Verstraete; Y De Deene; H Roels; A Dierick; D Uyttendaele; M Kunnen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical oncology: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  I S Gribbestad; G Nilsen; H E Fjøsne; S Kvinnsland; O A Haugen; P A Rinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Imaging tumor vascular heterogeneity and angiogenesis using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alan Jackson; James P B O'Connor; Geoff J M Parker; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Musculoskeletal tumours: preliminary experience with perfusion MRI.

Authors:  A Barile; G Regis; R Masi; M Maggiori; A Gallo; C Faletti; C Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.