Literature DB >> 20577041

Experimental study on photon-beam peripheral doses, their components and some possibilities for their reduction.

Ndimofor Chofor1, Dietrich Harder, Antje Rühmann, Kay C Willborn, Tilo Wiezorek, Björn Poppe.   

Abstract

The component analysis of the peripheral doses produced at typical accelerators such as the Siemens Primus 6/15 is regarded as an approach enabling technical strategies towards the reduction of second malignancies associated with photon beam radiotherapy. Suitable phantom and detector arrangements have been applied to show that the unavoidable peripheral dose contribution due to photon scattering from the directly irradiated part of the body or phantom does not constitute the entirety of the peripheral doses. Rather, there are peripheral dose contributions due to beam head leakage and to extrafocal radiation which can be regarded as partly avoidable. Simple methods of reducing beam head leakage from the Siemens Primus 6/15 linac are, for the crossplane direction, to install a pair of adjustable shielding blocks in the accessory holder and, for the inplane direction, to close all out-of-field leaf pairs of the multileaf collimator via the treatment planning system software. The relative efficiency of these shielding measures is largest in the case of small unavoidable dose contributions, i.e. for small fields and small depths. Methods of avoiding doses coming from extrafocal radiation are also envisaged for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20577041     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/14/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Stephen F Kry; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Risk of second malignant neoplasm following proton versus intensity-modulated photon radiotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Rebecca M Howell; Sunil Krishnan; Sarah B Scarboro; Dragan Mirkovic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Influence of Specific Treatment Parameters on Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses in a Phantom Model of Prostate SBRT with CyberKnife and TrueBeam.

Authors:  Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Piotr Romanski; Adam Ryczkowski; Wiktoria Suchorska; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Igor Piotrowski; Dorota Borowicz; Kinga Graczyk; Natalia Matuszak; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23

4.  Imaging Dose, Cancer Risk and Cost Analysis in Image-guided Radiotherapy of Cancers.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Sen Bai; Yibao Zhang; Xin Ming; Ying Zhang; Jun Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Monte Carlo Study of Fetal Dosimetry Parameters for 6 MV Photon Beam.

Authors:  Maryam Atarod; Parvaneh Shokrani
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2013-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.