Tao Shi1, Hongwen Huang, Michael S Barker. 1. Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Speciality Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To assess the number and phylogenetic distribution of large-scale genome duplications in the ancestry of Actinidia, publicly available expressed sequenced tags (ESTs) for members of the Actinidiaceae and related Ericales, including tea (Camellia sinensis), were analysed. METHODS: Synonymous divergences (K(s)) were calculated for all duplications within gene families and examined for evidence of large-scale duplication events. Phylogenetic comparisons for a selection of orthologues among several related species in Ericales and two outgroups permitted placement of duplication events in relation to lineage divergences. Gene ontology (GO) categories were analysed for each whole-genome duplication (WGD) and the whole transcriptome. KEY RESULTS: Evidence for three ancient WGDs in Actinidia was found. Analyses of paleologue GO categories indicated a different pattern of retained genes for each genome duplication, but a pattern consistent with the dosage-balance hypothesis among all retained paleologues. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for one independent WGD in the ancestry of Actinidia (Ad-alpha), a WGD shared by Actinidia and Camellia (Ad-beta), and the well-established At-gamma WGD that occurred prior to the divergence of all taxa examined. More ESTs in other taxa are needed to elucidate which groups in Ericales share the Ad-beta or Ad-alpha duplications and their impact on diversification.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To assess the number and phylogenetic distribution of large-scale genome duplications in the ancestry of Actinidia, publicly available expressed sequenced tags (ESTs) for members of the Actinidiaceae and related Ericales, including tea (Camellia sinensis), were analysed. METHODS: Synonymous divergences (K(s)) were calculated for all duplications within gene families and examined for evidence of large-scale duplication events. Phylogenetic comparisons for a selection of orthologues among several related species in Ericales and two outgroups permitted placement of duplication events in relation to lineage divergences. Gene ontology (GO) categories were analysed for each whole-genome duplication (WGD) and the whole transcriptome. KEY RESULTS: Evidence for three ancient WGDs in Actinidia was found. Analyses of paleologue GO categories indicated a different pattern of retained genes for each genome duplication, but a pattern consistent with the dosage-balance hypothesis among all retained paleologues. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for one independent WGD in the ancestry of Actinidia (Ad-alpha), a WGD shared by Actinidia and Camellia (Ad-beta), and the well-established At-gamma WGD that occurred prior to the divergence of all taxa examined. More ESTs in other taxa are needed to elucidate which groups in Ericales share the Ad-beta or Ad-alpha duplications and their impact on diversification.
Authors: Steven Maere; Stefanie De Bodt; Jeroen Raes; Tineke Casneuf; Marc Van Montagu; Martin Kuiper; Yves Van de Peer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael S Barker; Nolan C Kane; Marta Matvienko; Alexander Kozik; Richard W Michelmore; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 16.240
Authors: Douglas E Soltis; Victor A Albert; Jim Leebens-Mack; Charles D Bell; Andrew H Paterson; Chunfang Zheng; David Sankoff; Claude W Depamphilis; P Kerr Wall; Pamela S Soltis Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Ross N Crowhurst; Andrew P Gleave; Elspeth A MacRae; Charles Ampomah-Dwamena; Ross G Atkinson; Lesley L Beuning; Sean M Bulley; David Chagne; Ken B Marsh; Adam J Matich; Mirco Montefiori; Richard D Newcomb; Robert J Schaffer; Björn Usadel; Andrew C Allan; Helen L Boldingh; Judith H Bowen; Marcus W Davy; Rheinhart Eckloff; A Ross Ferguson; Lena G Fraser; Emma Gera; Roger P Hellens; Bart J Janssen; Karin Klages; Kim R Lo; Robin M MacDiarmid; Bhawana Nain; Mark A McNeilage; Maysoon Rassam; Annette C Richardson; Erik Ha Rikkerink; Gavin S Ross; Roswitha Schröder; Kimberley C Snowden; Edwige J F Souleyre; Matt D Templeton; Eric F Walton; Daisy Wang; Mindy Y Wang; Yanming Y Wang; Marion Wood; Rongmei Wu; Yar-Khing Yauk; William A Laing Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2008-07-27 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Saemundur Sveinsson; Joshua McDill; Gane K S Wong; Juanjuan Li; Xia Li; Michael K Deyholos; Quentin C B Cronk Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Qiong Zhang; Lei Zhao; Ryan A Folk; Jian-Li Zhao; Nelson A Zamora; Shi-Xiong Yang; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Lian-Ming Gao; Hua Peng; Xiang-Qin Yu Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Michael S Barker; Katrina M Dlugosch; Louie Dinh; R Sashikiran Challa; Nolan C Kane; Matthew G King; Loren H Rieseberg Journal: Evol Bioinform Online Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 1.625