Literature DB >> 20576487

Forecasting in vivo oral absorption and food effect of micronized and nanosized aprepitant formulations in humans.

Yasushi Shono1, Ekarat Jantratid, Filippos Kesisoglou, Christos Reppas, Jennifer B Dressman.   

Abstract

This study coupled results from biorelevant dissolution tests with in silico simulation technology to forecast in vivo oral absorption of micronized and nanosized aprepitant formulations in the pre- and post-prandial states. In vitro dissolution tests of the nanosized aprepitant formulation and micronized drug were performed in biorelevant and compendial media. An in silico physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed based on STELLA software using dissolution kinetics, standard gastrointestinal (GI) parameters and post-absorptive disposition parameters. GI parameters (gastric emptying rate and GI fluid volume) were varied according to the dosing conditions. Disposition parameters were estimated by fitting compartmental models to the in vivo oral PK data. Predictions of in vivo performance in each prandial state were evaluated using the AUC and C(max) generated from the simulated PK profiles. To predict oral absorption from the extremely fast dissolving nanosized aprepitant formulation, several variations on a previously published model were evaluated. Although models that assumed that the formulation behaved as an oral solution or that adjusted the dissolution kinetics according to the different numbers of particles per gram between micronized and nanosized aprepitant generated profiles similar to the observed in vivo data in the fed state, simulated profiles for the fasted state showed much faster absorption than that observed in the in vivo data. This appeared to result from the assumption of no absorption restrictions in those models. To better predict in vivo performance in both fasted and fed states, a model that adds permeability restrictions to absorption was applied. This model not only simulated the in vivo profiles for aprepitant well in both prandial states, but also predicted the dependency of the pharmacokinetics on the dose and the particle size of aprepitant. In conclusion, a model based on STELLA software combined with dissolution results in biorelevant media successfully forecasts the in vivo performance of both nanosized and micronized formulations of aprepitant in the fed and fasted states. Although dissolution is the primary limitation to the rate of absorption for micronized aprepitant, some permeability restrictions are revealed for the nanosized formulation. The results also indicate that biorelevant dissolution media have strong advantages over compendial media in forecasting the in vivo behavior of aprepitant. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20576487     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm        ISSN: 0939-6411            Impact factor:   5.571


  23 in total

1.  A semi-mechanistic modeling strategy to link in vitro and in vivo drug release for modified release formulations.

Authors:  Martin Bergstrand; Erik Söderlind; Ulf G Eriksson; Werner Weitschies; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Development of a new method to assess nanocrystal dissolution based on light scattering.

Authors:  Katharina Anhalt; Simon Geissler; Meike Harms; Markus Weigandt; Gert Fricker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Crystalline nanosuspensions as potential toxicology and clinical oral formulations for BCS II/IV compounds.

Authors:  Filippos Kesisoglou; Amitava Mitra
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Use of preclinical dog studies and absorption modeling to facilitate late stage formulation bridging for a BCS II drug candidate.

Authors:  Filippos Kesisoglou
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  In vivo bioequivalence and in vitro similarity factor (f2) for dissolution profile comparisons of extended release formulations: how and when do they match?

Authors:  John Z Duan; Kareen Riviere; Patrick Marroum
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Understanding Mechanisms of Food Effect and Developing Reliable PBPK Models Using a Middle-out Approach.

Authors:  Xavier J H Pepin; James E Huckle; Ravindra V Alluri; Sumit Basu; Stephanie Dodd; Neil Parrott; Arian Emami Riedmaier
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Case studies for practical food effect assessments across BCS/BDDCS class compounds using in silico, in vitro, and preclinical in vivo data.

Authors:  Tycho Heimbach; Binfeng Xia; Tsu-han Lin; Handan He
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Biorelevant in vitro performance testing of orally administered dosage forms-workshop report.

Authors:  Christos Reppas; Horst-Dieter Friedel; Amy R Barker; Lucinda F Buhse; Todd L Cecil; Susanne Keitel; Johannes Kraemer; J Michael Morris; Vinod P Shah; Mary P Stickelmeyer; Chikako Yomota; Cynthia K Brown
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models: approaches for enabling personalized medicine.

Authors:  Clara Hartmanshenn; Megerle Scherholz; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Quantitative Systems Pharmacology: A Framework for Context.

Authors:  Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2016-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.