Literature DB >> 20576201

Socio-economic differences in eating-related attitudes, behaviours and environments of adolescents.

Jennifer Utter1, Simon Denny, Sue Crengle, Shanthi Ameratunga, Terryann Clark, Ralph Maddison, Teuila Percival.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between area-level socio-economic status and healthy and less healthy eating behaviours among adolescents and to determine whether the relationship between area-level socio-economic status and dietary behaviours was related to the relevant attitudes and environments.
DESIGN: Data were collected as part of Youth'07, a nationally representative survey of the health and well-being of New Zealand youth.
SETTING: New Zealand secondary schools, 2007.
SUBJECTS: A total of 9107 secondary-school students in New Zealand.
RESULTS: Students from more deprived areas perceived more supportive school environments and cared as much about healthy eating as students in more affluent areas. However, these students were significantly more likely to report consuming fast food, soft drinks and chocolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Addressing area-level socio-economic disparities in healthy eating requires addressing the availability, affordability and marketing of unhealthy snack foods, particularly in economically deprived areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20576201     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010001898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  8 in total

1.  Main meal frequency measures in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study: agreement with 7-day 24-h recalls.

Authors:  Trine Pagh Pedersen; Bjørn E Holstein; Bjarne Laursen; Mette Rasmussen
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Understanding the relationship between food environments, deprivation and childhood overweight and obesity: evidence from a cross sectional England-wide study.

Authors:  Andreea Cetateanu; Andy Jones
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Socio-Economic Factors, the Food Environment and Lunchtime Food Purchasing by Young People at Secondary School.

Authors:  Wendy Wills; Giada Danesi; Ariadne Beatrice Kapetanaki; Laura Hamilton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Potential Owner-Related Risk Factors That May Contribute to Obesity in Companion Dogs in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors:  Rachel Forrest; Leena Awawdeh; Fiona Esam; Maria Pearson; Natalie Waran
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effect of the multicomponent healthy high school intervention on meal frequency and eating habits among high school students in Denmark: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katrine Sidenius Duus; Camilla Thørring Bonnesen; Johanne Aviaja Rosing; Katrine Rich Madsen; Trine Pagh Pedersen; Mette Toftager; Lau Caspar Thygesen; Rikke Fredenslund Krølner
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Salt intake and the association with blood pressure in young Iranian children: first report from the middle East and north Africa.

Authors:  Roya Kelishadi; Alaleh Gheisari; Narges Zare; Sanam Farajian; Keyvan Shariatinejad
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04

7.  Is socioeconomic status associated with dietary sodium intake in Australian children? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Carley A Grimes; Karen J Campbell; Lynn J Riddell; Caryl A Nowson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Fast food price, diet behavior, and cardiometabolic health: Differential associations by neighborhood SES and neighborhood fast food restaurant availability in the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Pasquale E Rummo; Katie A Meyer; Annie Green Howard; James M Shikany; David K Guilkey; Penny Gordon-Larsen
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.931

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.