Literature DB >> 20575915

A comparison of severely injured trauma patients admitted to level 1 trauma centres in Queensland and Germany.

Johanna M M Nijboer1, Martin E Wullschleger, Susan E Nielsen, Anitia M McNamee, Rolf Lefering, Hendrik-Jan ten Duis, Michael A Schuetz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The allocation of a trauma network in Queensland is still in the developmental phase. In a search for indicators to improve trauma care both locally as state-wide, a study was carried out comparing trauma patients in Queensland to trauma patients in Germany, a country with 82.4 million inhabitants and a well-established trauma system.
METHODS: Trauma patients > or =15 years of age, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 admitted to the Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) and to the 59 German hospitals participating in the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU-G) during the year 2005 were retrospectively identified and analysed.
RESULTS: Both cohorts are comparable when it comes to demographics and injury mechanism, but differ significantly in other important aspects. Striking is the low number of primary admitted patients in the PAH cohort: 58% versus 83% in the DGU-G cohort. PAH patients were less physiologically deranged and less severely injured: ISS 25.2 +/- 9.9 versus 29.9 +/- 13.1 (P < 0.001). Subsequently, they less often needed surgery (61% versus 79%), ICU admission (49% versus 92%) and had a lower mortality: 9.8% versus 17.9% of the DGU-G cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Relevant differences were the low number of primary admissions, the lesser severity of injuries, and the low mortality of the patients treated at the PAH. These differences are likely to be interrelated and Queensland's size and suboptimal organization of trauma care may have played an important role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20575915     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05210.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

1.  Characterization of image transfer patterns in a regional trauma network.

Authors:  Philipp Neuhaus; Thomas Weber; Martin Dugas; Christian Juhra; Bernhard Breil
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany.

Authors:  T Brinck; L Handolin; T Paffrath; R Lefering
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lynne Moore; Howard Champion; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Brice-Lionel Kuimi; Gerard O'Reilly; Ari Leppaniemi; Peter Cameron; Cameron S Palmer; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Belinda Gabbe; Christine Gaarder; Natalie Yanchar; Henry Thomas Stelfox; Raul Coimbra; John Kortbeek; Vanessa K Noonan; Amy Gunning; Malcolm Gordon; Monty Khajanchi; Teegwendé V Porgo; Alexis F Turgeon; Luke Leenen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Trauma systems: models of prehospital and inhospital care.

Authors:  M Hofman; R Sellei; R Peralta; Z Balogh; T H Wong; J A Evans; K King; H-C Pape
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®).

Authors:  B Ali Ali; R Lefering; M Fortun Moral; T Belzunegui Otano
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.