Literature DB >> 20574907

Meeting the common needs of a more effective and efficient testing and assessment paradigm for chemical risk management.

Vicki Dellarco1, Tala Henry, Phil Sayre, Jennifer Seed, Steven Bradbury.   

Abstract

Significant advances have been made in human health and ecological risk assessment over the last decade. Substantial challenges, however, remain in providing credible scientific information in a timely and efficient manner to support chemical risk assessment and management decisions. A major challenge confronting risk managers is the need for critical information to address risk uncertainties in large chemical inventories such as high- and medium-production-volume industrial chemicals or pesticide inert ingredients. From a strategic and tactical viewpoint, an integrated approach that relies on all existing knowledge and uses a range of methods, including those from emerging and novel technologies, is needed to advance progressive and focused testing strategies, as well as to advance the utility and predictability of the risk assessment by providing more relevant information. A hypothesis-based approach that draws on all relevant information is consistent with the vision articulated in the 2007 report by the National Research Council, Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. This article describes the current practices in evaluating chemical risks and ongoing efforts to enhance the quality and efficiency of risk assessment and risk management decisions within the Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574907     DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  7 in total

Review 1.  Developing and applying the adverse outcome pathway concept for understanding and predicting neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Anna Bal-Price; Pamela J Lein; Kimberly P Keil; Sunjay Sethi; Timothy Shafer; Marta Barenys; Ellen Fritsche; Magdalini Sachana; M E Bette Meek
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 2.  Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Qiang Zhang; Paul L Carmichael; Kim Boekelheide; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Accelerating the development of 21st-century toxicology: outcome of a Human Toxicology Project Consortium workshop.

Authors:  Martin L Stephens; Craig Barrow; Melvin E Andersen; Kim Boekelheide; Paul L Carmichael; Michael P Holsapple; Mark Lafranconi
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Key Elements for Judging the Quality of a Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Penelope A Fenner-Crisp; Vicki L Dellarco
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  A decision analytic approach to exposure-based chemical prioritization.

Authors:  Jade Mitchell; Nicolas Pabon; Zachary A Collier; Peter P Egeghy; Elaine Cohen-Hubal; Igor Linkov; Daniel A Vallero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Computational Exposure Science: An Emerging Discipline to Support 21st-Century Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Peter P Egeghy; Linda S Sheldon; Kristin K Isaacs; Halûk Özkaynak; Michael-Rock Goldsmith; John F Wambaugh; Richard S Judson; Timothy J Buckley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis.

Authors:  M E Meek; A Boobis; I Cote; V Dellarco; G Fotakis; S Munn; J Seed; C Vickers
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.