Literature DB >> 20574905

Virtual tissues in toxicology.

Imran Shah1, John Wambaugh.   

Abstract

New approaches are vital for efficiently evaluating human health risk of thousands of chemicals in commerce. In vitro models offer a high-throughput approach for assaying chemical-induced molecular and cellular changes; however, bridging these perturbations to in vivo effects across chemicals, dose, time, and species remains challenging. Technological advances in multiresolution imaging and multiscale simulation are making it feasible to reconstruct tissues in silico. In toxicology, these "virtual" tissues (VT) aim to predict histopathological outcomes from alterations of cellular phenotypes that are controlled by chemical-induced perturbations in molecular pathways. The behaviors of thousands of heterogeneous cells in tissues are simulated discretely using agent-based modeling (ABM), in which computational "agents" mimic cell interactions and cellular responses to the microenvironment. The behavior of agents is constrained by physical laws and biological rules derived from experimental evidence. VT extend compartmental physiologic models to simulate both acute insults as well as the chronic effects of low-dose exposure. Furthermore, agent behavior can encode the logic of signaling and genetic regulatory networks to evaluate the role of different pathways in chemical-induced injury. To extrapolate toxicity across species, chemicals, and doses, VT require four main components: (a) organization of prior knowledge on physiologic events to define the mechanistic rules for agent behavior, (b) knowledge on key chemical-induced molecular effects, including activation of stress sensors and changes in molecular pathways that alter the cellular phenotype, (c) multiresolution quantitative and qualitative analysis of histologic data to characterize and measure chemical-, dose-, and time-dependent physiologic events, and (d) multiscale, spatiotemporal simulation frameworks to effectively calibrate and evaluate VT using experimental data. This investigation presents the motivation, implementation, and application of VT with examples from hepatotoxicity and carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574905     DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2010.483948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  14 in total

1.  On-chip evaluation of shear stress effect on cytotoxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Donghyuk Kim; Yu-Shen Lin; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing.

Authors:  Edward L LeCluyse; Rafal P Witek; Melvin E Andersen; Mark J Powers
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Qiang Zhang; Paul L Carmichael; Kim Boekelheide; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Simulating quantitative cellular responses using asynchronous threshold Boolean network ensembles.

Authors:  John Jack; John F Wambaugh; Imran Shah
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-07-11

5.  Systems Biology and Biomarkers of Early Effects for Occupational Exposure Limit Setting.

Authors:  D Gayle DeBord; Lyle Burgoon; Stephen W Edwards; Lynne T Haber; M Helen Kanitz; Eileen Kuempel; Russell S Thomas; Berran Yucesoy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  The virtual cell based assay: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Rabea Graepel; Lara Lamon; David Asturiol; Elisabet Berggren; Elisabeth Joossens; Alicia Paini; Pilar Prieto; Maurice Whelan; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Virtual Cell Based Assay simulations of intra-mitochondrial concentrations in hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Andrew P Worth; Jochem Louisse; Peter Macko; J V Sala Benito; Alicia Paini
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Systems Toxicology: Real World Applications and Opportunities.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Rex E FitzGerald; Paul Jennings; Gary R Mirams; Manuel C Peitsch; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Imran Shah; Martin F Wilks; Shana J Sturla
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Modeling drug- and chemical-induced hepatotoxicity with systems biology approaches.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Lisl K M Shoda; Qiang Zhang; Courtney G Woods; Brett A Howell; Scott Q Siler; Jeffrey L Woodhead; Yuching Yang; Patrick McMullen; Paul B Watkins; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  The Next Generation of Risk Assessment Multi-Year Study-Highlights of Findings, Applications to Risk Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ila Cote; Melvin E Andersen; Gerald T Ankley; Stanley Barone; Linda S Birnbaum; Kim Boekelheide; Frederic Y Bois; Lyle D Burgoon; Weihsueh A Chiu; Douglas Crawford-Brown; Kevin M Crofton; Michael DeVito; Robert B Devlin; Stephen W Edwards; Kathryn Z Guyton; Dale Hattis; Richard S Judson; Derek Knight; Daniel Krewski; Jason Lambert; Elizabeth Anne Maull; Donna Mendrick; Gregory M Paoli; Chirag Jagdish Patel; Edward J Perkins; Gerald Poje; Christopher J Portier; Ivan Rusyn; Paul A Schulte; Anton Simeonov; Martyn T Smith; Kristina A Thayer; Russell S Thomas; Reuben Thomas; Raymond R Tice; John J Vandenberg; Daniel L Villeneuve; Scott Wesselkamper; Maurice Whelan; Christine Whittaker; Ronald White; Menghang Xia; Carole Yauk; Lauren Zeise; Jay Zhao; Robert S DeWoskin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.