INTRODUCTION: To compare risk factors for disease and current problems in long-term testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) and age-matched population-based controls (NORMs). METHODS: The study was cross-sectional and concerned 1,291 Norwegian TCSs followed up after a mean of 11 years, and 6,455 NORMs. Both TCSs and NORMs completed questionnaires and had a clinical examination. Indices for risk factors and current problems were calculated. Outcome measures were: visits to general practitioners last year, poor self-rated health, and poor quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: The mean risk score was significantly lower and the mean current problem score significantly higher in TCSs compared to NORMs without reaching clinical significance. The risk for future fatal cardiac events did not differ between the groups. TCSs had a higher risk for visiting a general practitioner than NORMs (OR 3.58, 95% CI 3.09-4.15), while no significant difference was observed for self-rated health. Poor QoL in TCSs was significantly associated with more current problems than risk factors. Previous treatment for mental problems, presence of severe somatic disease and musculo-skeletal problems were significantly associated with all three outcome measures. Musculo-skeletal problems were most strongly associated with visits to general practitioners among TCSs. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors for preventive clinical interventions and current problems that eventually should be treated were identified in TCSs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: TCSs show several risk factors and current problems that are relevant for visits to general practitioners, poorer self-rated health, and poorer QoL. These should get attention from health personnel caring for TCSs.
INTRODUCTION: To compare risk factors for disease and current problems in long-term testicular cancer survivors (TCSs) and age-matched population-based controls (NORMs). METHODS: The study was cross-sectional and concerned 1,291 Norwegian TCSs followed up after a mean of 11 years, and 6,455 NORMs. Both TCSs and NORMs completed questionnaires and had a clinical examination. Indices for risk factors and current problems were calculated. Outcome measures were: visits to general practitioners last year, poor self-rated health, and poor quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: The mean risk score was significantly lower and the mean current problem score significantly higher in TCSs compared to NORMs without reaching clinical significance. The risk for future fatal cardiac events did not differ between the groups. TCSs had a higher risk for visiting a general practitioner than NORMs (OR 3.58, 95% CI 3.09-4.15), while no significant difference was observed for self-rated health. Poor QoL in TCSs was significantly associated with more current problems than risk factors. Previous treatment for mental problems, presence of severe somatic disease and musculo-skeletal problems were significantly associated with all three outcome measures. Musculo-skeletal problems were most strongly associated with visits to general practitioners among TCSs. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors for preventive clinical interventions and current problems that eventually should be treated were identified in TCSs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: TCSs show several risk factors and current problems that are relevant for visits to general practitioners, poorer self-rated health, and poorer QoL. These should get attention from health personnel caring for TCSs.
Authors: H S Haugnes; N Aass; S D Fosså; O Dahl; O Klepp; E A Wist; J Svartberg; T Wilsgaard; R M Bremnes Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-10-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: P Mäntyselkä; E Kumpusalo; R Ahonen; A Kumpusalo; J Kauhanen; H Viinamäki; P Halonen; J Takala Journal: Pain Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Alv A Dahl; Carl Fredrik Haaland; Arnstein Mykletun; Roy Bremnes; Olav Dahl; Olbjørn Klepp; Erik Wist; Sophie D Fosså Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lene Thorsen; Wenche Nystad; Hein Stigum; Olav Dahl; Olbjørn Klepp; Roy M Bremnes; Erik Wist; Sophie D Fosså Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tone Skaali; Sophie D Fosså; Roy Bremnes; Olav Dahl; Carl Fredrik Haaland; Erik Rønneberg Hauge; Olbjørn Klepp; Jan Oldenburg; Erik Wist; Alv A Dahl Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: R M Conroy; K Pyörälä; A P Fitzgerald; S Sans; A Menotti; G De Backer; D De Bacquer; P Ducimetière; P Jousilahti; U Keil; I Njølstad; R G Oganov; T Thomsen; H Tunstall-Pedoe; A Tverdal; H Wedel; P Whincup; L Wilhelmsen; I M Graham Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Chunkit Fung; Howard D Sesso; Annalynn M Williams; Sarah L Kerns; Patrick Monahan; Mohammad Abu Zaid; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Hamilton; David J Vaughn; Clair J Beard; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Ryan Cook; Sandra Althouse; Shirin Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard; Steve E Lipshultz; Lawrence H Einhorn; Sophie D Fossa; Lois B Travis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah L Kerns; Chunkit Fung; Patrick O Monahan; Shirin Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard; Mohammad I Abu Zaid; AnnaLynn M Williams; Timothy E Stump; Howard D Sesso; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Hamilton; David J Vaughn; Clair Beard; Robert A Huddart; Jeri Kim; Christian Kollmannsberger; Deepak M Sahasrabudhe; Ryan Cook; Sophie D Fossa; Lawrence H Einhorn; Lois B Travis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544