PURPOSE: To evaluate the detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. All included patients had previously consented to the use of their medical records for research. Sixty-two patients (38 men, 24 women; age range, 35-91 years) had undergone CT urography, which consisted of nonenhanced and pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT performed by using a dual-source scanner. Commercial software was used to create virtual nonenhanced images by suppressing the iodine signal from the pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT scans. Two radiologists, in consensus, evaluated the virtual nonenhanced images for the presence of stones. Sensitivity for detecting stones was calculated on a per-stone basis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also calculated on a per-renal unit (defined as the intrarenal collecting system and ureter of one kidney) basis. The true nonenhanced scan was considered the reference standard. A jackknife method was used because any patient may have multiple stones. RESULTS: Of 62 patients with 122 renal units, 21 patients with 25 renal units had a total of 43 stones (maximal transverse diameter range, 1-24 mm; median, 3 mm). The overall sensitivity for detecting stones was 63% (27 of 43 stones) per stone. Sensitivities were 29% (four of 14 stones) for 1-2-mm stones, 64% (nine of 14 stones) for 3-4-mm stones, 83% (five of six stones) for 5-6-mm stones, and 100% (nine of nine stones) for 7-mm or larger (7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9, 11, 15, and 24 mm) stones. All three ureteral stones (3, 4, and 8 mm) were correctly identified. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting stones on a per-renal unit basis were 65% (17 of 26 renal units), 92% (88 of 96 renal units), and 86% (105 of 122 renal units), respectively. CONCLUSION: Virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT enabled the detection of urinary stones with moderate accuracy. The detection of small (1-2-mm) stones was limited.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. All included patients had previously consented to the use of their medical records for research. Sixty-two patients (38 men, 24 women; age range, 35-91 years) had undergone CT urography, which consisted of nonenhanced and pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT performed by using a dual-source scanner. Commercial software was used to create virtual nonenhanced images by suppressing the iodine signal from the pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT scans. Two radiologists, in consensus, evaluated the virtual nonenhanced images for the presence of stones. Sensitivity for detecting stones was calculated on a per-stone basis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also calculated on a per-renal unit (defined as the intrarenal collecting system and ureter of one kidney) basis. The true nonenhanced scan was considered the reference standard. A jackknife method was used because any patient may have multiple stones. RESULTS: Of 62 patients with 122 renal units, 21 patients with 25 renal units had a total of 43 stones (maximal transverse diameter range, 1-24 mm; median, 3 mm). The overall sensitivity for detecting stones was 63% (27 of 43 stones) per stone. Sensitivities were 29% (four of 14 stones) for 1-2-mm stones, 64% (nine of 14 stones) for 3-4-mm stones, 83% (five of six stones) for 5-6-mm stones, and 100% (nine of nine stones) for 7-mm or larger (7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9, 11, 15, and 24 mm) stones. All three ureteral stones (3, 4, and 8 mm) were correctly identified. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting stones on a per-renal unit basis were 65% (17 of 26 renal units), 92% (88 of 96 renal units), and 86% (105 of 122 renal units), respectively. CONCLUSION: Virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT enabled the detection of urinary stones with moderate accuracy. The detection of small (1-2-mm) stones was limited.
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-12-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M M McNicholas; V D Raptopoulos; R K Schwartz; R G Sheiman; A Zormpala; P K Prassopoulos; R D Ernst; J D Pearlman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Elizabeth M Hecht; Christoph R Becker; Christianne Leidecker; Michael Staehler; Christian G Stief; Henriette Hildebrandt; Myrna C B Godoy; Myra E Finn; Flora Stepansky; Maximilian F Reiser; Michael Macari Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Su Young Yun; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Hye Jung Choo; Gi Won Shin; Sung Tae Kim; Young Gyun Jeong; Ji Young Lee; Hyun Seok Jung Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.804