Literature DB >> 20574086

Diabetes: prognostic value of CT coronary angiography--comparison with a nondiabetic population.

Jacob M Van Werkhoven1, Filippo Cademartiri, Sara Seitun, Erica Maffei, Alessandro Palumbo, Chiara Martini, Giuseppe Tarantini, Lucia J Kroft, Albert de Roos, Annick C Weustink, J Wouter Jukema, Diego Ardissino, Nico R Mollet, Joanne D Schuijf, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography in a diabetic population known to have or suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with that in nondiabetic individuals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained. Three hundred thirteen patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and 303 patients without DM underwent unenhanced 64-detector row CT, at which a calcium score was obtained, followed by CT angiography. Multidetector CT coronary angiograms were retrospectively classified as normal, showing nonobstructive CAD (<or=50% luminal narrowing), or showing obstructive CAD (>50% luminal narrowing). During follow-up after CT angiography, major events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization) and total events (major events plus coronary revascularizations) were recorded for each patient. Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to compare survival rates.
RESULTS: In the group of 313 patients with DM, there were 213 men, and the mean age was 62 years +/- 11 (standard deviation). In the group of 303 patients without DM, there were 203 men, and the mean age was 63 years +/- 11. The mean number of diseased segments (5.6 vs 4.4, P = .001) and the rate of obstructive CAD (51% vs 37%, P < .001) were higher in patients with DM. Patients were followed up for a mean of 20 months +/- 5.4 (range, 6-44 months). At multivariate analysis, DM (P < .001) and evidence of obstructive CAD (P < .001) were independent predictors of outcome. Obstructive CAD remained a significant multivariate predictor for both patients with DM and patients without DM. In both patients with DM and patients without DM with absence of disease, the event rate was 0%. The event rate increased to 36% in patients without DM but with obstructive CAD and was highest (47%) in patients with DM and obstructive CAD.
CONCLUSION: In both patients with DM and patients without DM, multidetector CT coronary angiography provides incremental prognostic information over baseline clinical variables, and the absence of atherosclerosis at CT coronary angiography is associated with an excellent prognosis. Multidetector CT coronary angiography might be a clinically useful tool for improving risk stratification in both patients with DM and patients without DM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20574086     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.1090600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  Myocardial perfusion imaging: a plus for coronary risk classification in diabetics.

Authors:  Albert Flotats
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM).

Authors:  E di Cesare; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; L Natale; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Computed tomography coronary angiography in the selection of outlier patients: a feasibility report.

Authors:  E Maffei; C Martini; S Seitun; T Arcadi; C Tedeschi; A Guaricci; R Malagò; G Tarantini; A Aldrovandi; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and coronary CT angiography in patients with intermediate risk of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Stefania Daniele; Wanda Acampa; Massimo Imbriaco; Teresa Pellegrino; Giancarlo Messalli; Evgjeni Xhoxhi; Giuseppina Del Prete; Carmela Nappi; Domenico Accardo; Francesco Angeloni; Domenico Bonaduce; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Assessment of cardiovascular risk in diabetes: Risk scores and provocative testing.

Authors:  Teresa Lam; Kharis Burns; Mark Dennis; N Wah Cheung; Jenny E Gunton
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 6.  CT coronary calcification: What does a score of "0" mean?

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Leonardo Sara; Jeff A Brinker; João A C Lima; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Coronary artery calcium scoring, what is answered and what questions remain.

Authors:  George Youssef; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

8.  Incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography over coronary artery calcium score for risk prediction of major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic diabetic individuals.

Authors:  James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Millie J Gomez; Stephan Achenbach; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Matthew J Budoff; Filippo Cademartiri; Tracy Q Callister; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Victor Cheng; Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Benjamin Chow; Ricardo Cury; Augustin Delago; Allison Dunning; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martin Hadamitzky; Jorg Hausleiter; Philipp Kaufmann; Yong-Jin Kim; Jonathon Leipsic; Fay Y Lin; Erica Maffei; Gilbert Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Todd C Villines; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.162

9.  Rationale, design and methods of CTCA-PRORECAD (Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Prognostic Registry for Coronary Artery Disease): a multicentre and multivendor registry.

Authors:  E Maffei; M Midiri; V Russo; M Rengo; C Tedeschi; P Spagnolo; S Seitun; M Francone; A I Guaricci; N Carrabba; R Malagò; A Cuocolo; T Arcadi; O A Catalano; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Unprotected left main coronary artery disease after revascularization : effect of diabetes on patient outcomes.

Authors:  X Yu; Y Luo; J He; Y Gao; Y Zhang; X Zhang; C Wu; X Ren; S Lv; F Chen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.