Literature DB >> 20573643

Chart documentation quality and its relationship to the validity of administrative data discharge records.

Lawrence So1, Cynthia A Beck, Susan Brien, James Kennedy, Thomas E Feasby, William A Ghali.   

Abstract

The validity of administrative data may be vulnerable to how well physicians document medical charts. The objective of this study is to determine the relationship between chart documentation quality and the validity of administrative data. The charts for patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy were re-abstracted and rated for the quality of documentation. Poorly and well-documented charts were compared by patient, physician, and hospital variables, as well as on agreement between the administrative and re-abstracted data. Of the 2061 charts reviewed, 42.6 per cent were rated well documented. The proportion of charts well documented varied from 14.6 to 87.5 per cent across 17 hospitals, but did not vary significantly by patient characteristics. The kappa statistic was generally higher for well-documented charts than for poorly documented charts, but varied across comorbidities. In conclusion, poorly documented hospital charts tend to be translated into invalid administrative data, which reduces the communication of clinical information among healthcare providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20573643     DOI: 10.1177/1460458210364784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Informatics J        ISSN: 1460-4582            Impact factor:   2.681


  15 in total

1.  HIV management by nurse prescribers compared with doctors at a paediatric centre in Gaborone, Botswana.

Authors:  Gadzikanani Monyatsi; Paul C Mullan; Benjamin R Phelps; Michael A Tolle; Edwin M Machine; Floriza F Gennari; Jenny Makosky; Gabriel M Anabwani
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2011-12-14

Review 2.  [The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review].

Authors:  E Hanisch; T F Weigel; A Buia; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Evaluation of interventions to improve inpatient hospital documentation within electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie Wiebe; Lucia Otero Varela; Daniel J Niven; Paul E Ronksley; Nicolas Iragorri; Hude Quan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Quantifying limitations in chemotherapy data in administrative health databases: implications for measuring the quality of colorectal cancer care.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Daniel Rayson; Geoffrey A Porter; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-08

5.  Medication records in the emergency department: agreement between paper-based charts and automated dispensing device.

Authors:  Andrew Wing; Barbara Hill-Taylor; Ingrid Sketris; Jeanne Smith; Sam Stewart; Katrina F Hurley
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2012-07

6.  Data quality assessment in healthcare: a 365-day chart review of inpatients' health records at a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Ibrahim Taiwo Adeleke; Adedeji Olugbenga Adekanye; Kayode Abiodun Onawola; Alaba George Okuku; Samuel Adebowale Adefemi; Sunday Adesubomi Erinle; AbdurRahman Alhaji Shehu; Olubunmi Edith Yahaya; AbdulLateef Adisa Adebisi; John Adeniran James; Oloundare Olanrewaju AbdulGhaney; Lateef Mosebolatan Ogundiran; Abdullahi Daniyan Jibril; Moses Esimy Atakere; Moses Achinbee; Oluwaseun Ayoade Abodunrin; Muhammad Wasagi Hassan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Indicators of missing Electronic Medical Record (EMR) discharge summaries: A retrospective study on Canadian data.

Authors:  Natalie Wiebe; Yuan Xu; Abdel Aziz Shaheen; Catherine Eastwood; Bastien Boussat; Hude Quan
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Validity of AHRQ patient safety indicators derived from ICD-10 hospital discharge abstract data (chart review study).

Authors:  Hude Quan; Cathy Eastwood; Ceara Tess Cunningham; Mingfu Liu; Ward Flemons; Carolyn De Coster; William A Ghali
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Refining hypertension surveillance to account for potentially misclassified cases.

Authors:  Mingkai Peng; Guanmin Chen; Lisa M Lix; Finlay A McAlister; Karen Tu; Norm R Campbell; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Lawrence W Svenson; Hude Quan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A cohort study on physician documentation and the accuracy of administrative data coding to improve passive surveillance of transient ischaemic attacks.

Authors:  Amy Y X Yu; Hude Quan; Andrew D McRae; Gabrielle O Wagner; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.