BACKGROUND: The criterion standard for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes is cervical mediastinoscopy. Current methods that require transthoracic or cervical incisions can result in significant postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a novel, transesophageal endoscopic technique for mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection. DESIGN: Nonsurvival and survival animal study. SETTING: Animal trial at a tertiary-care academic center. SUBJECTS: This study involved 12 Yorkshire swine. INTERVENTION: An endoscopic cap band mucosectomy device was used to create an esophageal mucosal defect. By using the tip of the endoscope and biopsy forceps, a submucosal tunnel was fashioned, and, within the submucosal space, a hook-knife incised the muscular esophageal wall. The endoscope was then advanced into the mediastinum and chest. Mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy were performed to identify lymph node stations. Prototype endoscopic devices permitted lymph node dissection prior to removal with an electrocautery snare. A covered prototype stent was placed over the mucosectomy site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility of endoscopic transesophageal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Three lymph nodes (1 para-aortic and 2 right paratracheal) were removed in the 3 nonsurvival swine. Nine swine were survived for 14 days (range 13-14 days) and had a total of 7 lymph nodes (2 para-aortic and 5 paratracheal) removed. Two swine had no endoscopically visible lymph nodes in the mediastinum or chest. Lymph node dissection and resection was successful in all cases where lymph nodes were identified. Lymphadenectomy was completed in a median time of 20.0 minutes (range 8-60 minutes); median total procedure time was 70.0 minutes (range 28-105 minutes). Median lymph node size was 1.1 cm (range 0.6-1.4 cm). LIMITATIONS: Animal study. CONCLUSION: An endoscopic transesophageal approach can accomplish mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection and provides architecturally intact lymph node specimens for histologic examination.
BACKGROUND: The criterion standard for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes is cervical mediastinoscopy. Current methods that require transthoracic or cervical incisions can result in significant postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a novel, transesophageal endoscopic technique for mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection. DESIGN: Nonsurvival and survival animal study. SETTING: Animal trial at a tertiary-care academic center. SUBJECTS: This study involved 12 Yorkshire swine. INTERVENTION: An endoscopic cap band mucosectomy device was used to create an esophageal mucosal defect. By using the tip of the endoscope and biopsy forceps, a submucosal tunnel was fashioned, and, within the submucosal space, a hook-knife incised the muscular esophageal wall. The endoscope was then advanced into the mediastinum and chest. Mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy were performed to identify lymph node stations. Prototype endoscopic devices permitted lymph node dissection prior to removal with an electrocautery snare. A covered prototype stent was placed over the mucosectomy site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility of endoscopic transesophageal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Three lymph nodes (1 para-aortic and 2 right paratracheal) were removed in the 3 nonsurvival swine. Nine swine were survived for 14 days (range 13-14 days) and had a total of 7 lymph nodes (2 para-aortic and 5 paratracheal) removed. Two swine had no endoscopically visible lymph nodes in the mediastinum or chest. Lymph node dissection and resection was successful in all cases where lymph nodes were identified. Lymphadenectomy was completed in a median time of 20.0 minutes (range 8-60 minutes); median total procedure time was 70.0 minutes (range 28-105 minutes). Median lymph node size was 1.1 cm (range 0.6-1.4 cm). LIMITATIONS: Animal study. CONCLUSION: An endoscopic transesophageal approach can accomplish mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection and provides architecturally intact lymph node specimens for histologic examination.
Authors: A Fritscher-Ravens; K Patel; A Ghanbari; E Kahle; A von Herbay; T Fritscher; H Niemann; P Koehler Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Timothy Woodward; David McCluskey; Michael B Wallace; Massimo Raimondo; John Mannone; C Daniel Smith Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Kazuki Sumiyama; Christopher J Gostout; Elizabeth Rajan; Timothy A Bakken; Mary A Knipschield Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Denise W Gee; Field F Willingham; Gregory Y Lauwers; William R Brugge; David W Rattner Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Michael B Wallace; Jorge M S Pascual; Massimo Raimondo; Timothy A Woodward; Barbara L McComb; Julia E Crook; Margaret M Johnson; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Seth A Gross; Surakit Pungpapong; Joy N Hardee; John A Odell Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-02-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Henry Córdova; Raúl San José Estépar; Antonio Rodríguez-D'Jesús; Graciela Martínez-Pallí; Pedro Arguis; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Ricard Navarro-Ripoll; Juan M Perdomo; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Josep Llach; Kirby G Vosburgh; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Priscilla Magno; Mouen A Khashab; Manuel Mas; Samuel A Giday; Jonathan M Buscaglia; Eun Ji Shin; Xavier Dray; Anthony N Kalloo Journal: Minim Invasive Surg Date: 2012-05-24
Authors: Henry Córdova; Georgina Cubas; Marc Boada; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Graciela Martínez-Pallí; Josep M Gimferrer; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2015-08-11