AIM: To study the steady-state plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of raltegravir, etravirine, darunavir and ritonavir in heavily pre-treated patients. METHODS: Patients on a salvage regimen containing raltegravir, etravirine, darunavir and ritonavir were eligible for inclusion. During a 12 h dosing interval plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected. Drug concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS assay and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effect modelling. RESULTS: Irregular absorption was observed with raltegravir and darunavir, which may be caused by enterohepatic cycling. Relative bioavailability of ritonavir was low, when compared with other ritonavir regimens. Raltegravir plasma pharmacokinetics showed wide interpatient variability, while intracellular raltegravir concentrations could not be detected (<0.001 mg l(-1) in cell lysate). The intracellular to plasma ratios for etravirine, darunavir and ritonavir were 12.9, 1.32 and 7.72, respectively, and the relative standard error of these estimates were 16.3%, 12.3% and 13.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The observed distinct intracellular accumulation indicated that these drugs have different affinity for the cellular compartment. The relatively high intracellular accumulation of etravirine may explain its efficacy and its previously described absence of PK-PD relationships in the therapeutic concentration range, when compared with other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Lastly, the intracellular concentrations of ritonavir seem sufficient for inhibition of viral replication in the cellular compartment in PI-naive patients, but not in patients with HIV harbouring PI resistance.
AIM: To study the steady-state plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of raltegravir, etravirine, darunavir and ritonavir in heavily pre-treated patients. METHODS:Patients on a salvage regimen containing raltegravir, etravirine, darunavir and ritonavir were eligible for inclusion. During a 12 h dosing interval plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected. Drug concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS assay and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effect modelling. RESULTS: Irregular absorption was observed with raltegravir and darunavir, which may be caused by enterohepatic cycling. Relative bioavailability of ritonavir was low, when compared with other ritonavir regimens. Raltegravir plasma pharmacokinetics showed wide interpatient variability, while intracellular raltegravir concentrations could not be detected (<0.001 mg l(-1) in cell lysate). The intracellular to plasma ratios for etravirine, darunavir and ritonavir were 12.9, 1.32 and 7.72, respectively, and the relative standard error of these estimates were 16.3%, 12.3% and 13.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The observed distinct intracellular accumulation indicated that these drugs have different affinity for the cellular compartment. The relatively high intracellular accumulation of etravirine may explain its efficacy and its previously described absence of PK-PD relationships in the therapeutic concentration range, when compared with other non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Lastly, the intracellular concentrations of ritonavir seem sufficient for inhibition of viral replication in the cellular compartment in PI-naive patients, but not in patients with HIV harbouring PI resistance.
Authors: Lisa M Almond; Damitha Edirisinghe; Mark Dalton; Alec Bonington; David J Back; Saye H Khoo Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Bregt S Kappelhoff; Alwin D R Huitema; Kristel M L Crommentuyn; Jan W Mulder; Pieter L Meenhorst; Eric C M van Gorp; Albert T A Mairuhu; Jos H Beijnen Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kristel M L Crommentuyn; Jan W Mulder; Albert T A Mairuhu; Eric C M van Gorp; Pieter L Meenhorst; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2004-10
Authors: Bregt S Kappelhoff; Alwin D R Huitema; Zeynep Yalvaç; Jan M Prins; Jan W Mulder; Pieter L Meenhorst; Jos H Beijnen Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2005 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Saye H Khoo; Patrick G Hoggard; Ian Williams; E Rhiannon Meaden; Philippa Newton; Edmund G Wilkins; Alan Smith; John F Tjia; Judy Lloyd; Kevin Jones; Nick Beeching; Peter Carey; Barry Peters; David J Back Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jennifer Ford; Marta Boffito; Adrian Wildfire; Andrew Hill; David Back; Saye Khoo; Mark Nelson; Graeme Moyle; Brian Gazzard; Anton Pozniak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jennifer Ford; David Cornforth; Patrick G Hoggard; Zoe Cuthbertson; E Rhiannon Meaden; Ian Williams; Margaret Johnson; Elaine Daniels; Poe Hsyu; David J Back; Saye H Khoo Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2004-02
Authors: Lingzhi Wang; Gaik Hong Soon; Kok-Yong Seng; Jun Li; Edmund Lee; Eu-Leong Yong; Boon-Cher Goh; Charles Flexner; Lawrence Lee Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Amedeo De Nicolò; Marco Simiele; Andrea Calcagno; Adnan Mohamed Abdi; Stefano Bonora; Giovanni Di Perri; Antonio D'Avolio Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 5.191