AIM: Docetaxel has a low oral bioavailability due to affinity for P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzymes. Inhibition of the CYP3A4 enzymes by ritonavir resulted in increased oral bioavailability. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and to evaluate and quantify the influence of ritonavir on the PK of docetaxel. METHODS: Data from two clinical trials were included in the data analysis, in which docetaxel (75 mg m(-2) or 100 mg) had been administered intravenously or orally (10 mg or 100 mg) with or without co-administration of oral ritonavir (100 mg). Population modelling was performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. A three-compartment model was used to describe the i.v. data. PK data after oral administration, with or without co-administration of ritonavir, were incorporated into the model. RESULTS: Gut bioavailability of docetaxel increased approximately two-fold from 19 to 39% (CV 13%) with ritonavir co-administration. The hepatic extraction ratio and the elimination rate of docetaxel were best described by estimating the intrinsic clearance. Ritonavir was found to inhibit in a concentration dependent manner the intrinsic clearance of docetaxel, which was described by an inhibition constant of 0.028 microg ml(-1) (CV 36%). A maximum inhibition of docetaxel clearance of more then 90% was reached. CONCLUSIONS: A PK model describing both the PK of orally and intravenously administered docetaxel in combination with ritonavir, was successfully developed. Co-administration of ritonavir lead to increased oral absorption and reduced elimination rate of docetaxel.
AIM: Docetaxel has a low oral bioavailability due to affinity for P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzymes. Inhibition of the CYP3A4 enzymes by ritonavir resulted in increased oral bioavailability. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and to evaluate and quantify the influence of ritonavir on the PK of docetaxel. METHODS: Data from two clinical trials were included in the data analysis, in which docetaxel (75 mg m(-2) or 100 mg) had been administered intravenously or orally (10 mg or 100 mg) with or without co-administration of oral ritonavir (100 mg). Population modelling was performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. A three-compartment model was used to describe the i.v. data. PK data after oral administration, with or without co-administration of ritonavir, were incorporated into the model. RESULTS: Gut bioavailability of docetaxel increased approximately two-fold from 19 to 39% (CV 13%) with ritonavir co-administration. The hepatic extraction ratio and the elimination rate of docetaxel were best described by estimating the intrinsic clearance. Ritonavir was found to inhibit in a concentration dependent manner the intrinsic clearance of docetaxel, which was described by an inhibition constant of 0.028 microg ml(-1) (CV 36%). A maximum inhibition of docetaxel clearance of more then 90% was reached. CONCLUSIONS: A PK model describing both the PK of orally and intravenously administered docetaxel in combination with ritonavir, was successfully developed. Co-administration of ritonavir lead to increased oral absorption and reduced elimination rate of docetaxel.
Authors: Heleen A Bardelmeijer; Mariët Ouwehand; Tessa Buckle; Maarten T Huisman; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Olaf van Tellingen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jian-Feng Lu; Terrence F Blaschke; Charles Flexner; Susan L Rosenkranz; Lewis B Sheiner Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: J H Schellens; M M Malingré; C M Kruijtzer; H A Bardelmeijer; O van Tellingen; A H Schinkel; J H Beijnen Journal: Eur J Pharm Sci Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: D J Kempf; K C Marsh; G Kumar; A D Rodrigues; J F Denissen; E McDonald; M J Kukulka; A Hsu; G R Granneman; P A Baroldi; E Sun; D Pizzuti; J J Plattner; D W Norbeck; J M Leonard Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M M Malingré; D J Richel; J H Beijnen; H Rosing; F J Koopman; W W Ten Bokkel Huinink; M E Schot; J H Schellens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M C Launay-Iliadis; R Bruno; V Cosson; J C Vergniol; D Oulid-Aissa; M Marty; M Clavel; M Aapro; N Le Bail; A Iliadis Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 1995 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Felix Hammann; Verena Gotta; Katrin Conen; Michael Medinger; Philipp Cesana; Christoph Rochlitz; Anne B Taegtmeyer Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Huixin Yu; Jeroen J M A Hendrikx; Sven Rottenberg; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: AAPS J Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: J J M A Hendrikx; J S Lagas; E Wagenaar; H Rosing; J H M Schellens; J H Beijnen; A H Schinkel Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 7.640