Literature DB >> 20572898

Finite element analysis of performance in the skulls of marmosets and tamarins.

Elizabeth R Dumont1, Julian L Davis, Ian R Grosse, Anne M Burrows.   

Abstract

Reliance on plant exudates is a relatively rare dietary specialization among mammals. One well-studied example of closely related exudate feeders is the New World marmosets and tamarins. Whereas marmosets actively gouge tree bark with their incisors to stimulate the flow of sap, tamarins are opportunistic exudate feeders that do not gouge bark. Several studies of the dentaries and jaw adductors indicate that marmosets exhibit specializations for increased gape at the expense of bite force. Few studies, however, have looked to the cranium of marmosets for evidence of functional specializations. Using 3D finite element models of the marmoset Callithrix jacchus and the tamarin Saguinus fuscicollis, we investigated the performance of the cranium under loading regimes that mimicked unilateral molar biting and bark-gouging. We investigated three measures of performance: the efficiency with which muscle force is transferred to bite force, the extent to which the models are stressed (a predictor of failure), and the work expended by muscles as they deform the skull (total strain energy). We found that during molar biting the two models exhibited similar levels of performance, though the Saguinus model had slightly higher mechanical efficiency, a slightly lower state of stress, and expended more energy on deformation. In contrast, under the bark-gouging load, Callithrix exhibited much higher mechanical efficiency than Saguinas, but did so at the expense of more work and higher levels of von Mises stress. This analysis illustrates that differences in the shapes of the skulls of Callithrix and Saguinus confer differences in performance. Whether these aspects of performance are targets of selection awaits broader comparative analyses.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy © 2010 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20572898      PMCID: PMC3039787          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  21 in total

1.  A biomechanical analysis of skull form in gum-harvesting galagids.

Authors:  Susan H Williams; Christine E Wall; Christopher J Vinyard; William L Hylander
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Modeling elastic properties in finite-element analysis: how much precision is needed to produce an accurate model?

Authors:  David S Strait; Qian Wang; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Mark A Spencer; Biren A Patel
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2005-04

3.  Functional adaptations in the craniofacial morphology of Malagasy primates: shape variations associated with gummivory in the family Cheirogaleidae.

Authors:  Bénédicte Viguier
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Cranial shape in fruit, nectar, and exudate feeders: implications for interpreting the fossil record.

Authors:  E R Dumont
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Quantitative electromyography of the masticatory muscles of Pteropus giganteus (Megachiroptera).

Authors:  G De Gueldre; F De Vree
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Why did the strepsirhine tooth comb evolve.

Authors:  F S Szalay; D Seligsohn
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Finite-element analysis of biting behavior and bone stress in the facial skeletons of bats.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Dumont; Justin Piccirillo; Ian R Grosse
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2005-04

8.  Activity budget of Geoffroy's marmoset (Callithrix geoffroyi) in an Atlantic forest in southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  M Passamani
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  Comparative functional analysis of skull morphology of tree-gouging primates.

Authors:  Christopher J Vinyard; Christine E Wall; Susan H Williams; William L Hylander
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 10.  Vertical clinging, small body size, and the evolution of feeding adaptations in the Callitrichinae.

Authors:  P A Garber
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.868

View more
  24 in total

1.  Sensitivity and ex vivo validation of finite element models of the domestic pig cranium.

Authors:  Jen A Bright; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Predicting bite force and cranial biomechanics in the largest fossil rodent using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Philip G Cox; Andrés Rinderknecht; R Ernesto Blanco
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Paranthropus boisei.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Peter W Lucas; Shaji Michael; Ali Shekeban; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Richard H Madden; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; Sarah Wood; Christine Dzialo; Michael A Berthaume; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Biomechanical implications of intraspecific shape variation in chimpanzee crania: moving toward an integration of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Finite element modelling of squirrel, guinea pig and rat skulls: using geometric morphometrics to assess sensitivity.

Authors:  P G Cox; M J Fagan; E J Rayfield; N Jeffery
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The Hadropithecus conundrum reconsidered, with implications for interpreting diet in fossil hominins.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Dumont; Timothy M Ryan; Laurie R Godfrey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Feeding biomechanics in Acanthostega and across the fish-tetrapod transition.

Authors:  James M Neenan; Marcello Ruta; Jennifer A Clack; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Masticatory biomechanics of the Laotian rock rat, Laonastes aenigmamus, and the function of the zygomaticomandibularis muscle.

Authors:  Philip G Cox; Joanna Kirkham; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Model sensitivity and use of the comparative finite element method in mammalian jaw mechanics: mandible performance in the gray wolf.

Authors:  Zhijie Jack Tseng; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Henryk Flashner; Xiaoming Wang; Reyes Enciso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A 3D interactive model and atlas of the jaw musculature of Alligator mississippiensis.

Authors:  Casey M Holliday; Henry P Tsai; Rebecca J Skiljan; Ian D George; Sami Pathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.