Literature DB >> 20572137

Deep venous thrombosis: diagnostic value of non-contrast-enhanced MR venography using electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier FSE.

Atsushi Ono1, Kenya Murase, Toshitaka Taniguchi, Osamu Shibutani, Satoru Takata, Yasuyuki Kobashi, Yusuke Hashiguchi, Mitsue Miyazaki.   

Abstract

We prospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of non-contrast-enhanced MR venography using both the flow-refocused fresh-blood imaging (FR-FBI) and the swap phase-encode arterial double-subtraction elimination (SPADE) techniques for detecting deep vein thrombosis (DVT), as compared using conventional X-ray venography as the reference standard. Forty-one legs of 32 consecutive patients (eight men, 24 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 69.4 +/- 15.3 years) suspected of having deep vein thrombosis and thus examined using conventional X-ray venography underwent MR FR-FBI and SPADE. Twenty-five of the 32 patients had nonmagnetizing, metal implants they had received during hip or leg surgery. Two radiologists independently assessed the MR venograms as either diagnostic or nondiagnostic and with either the presence or absence of thrombi. The sensitivities of FR-FBI and SPADE for diagnosing thrombus were 100% (53 of 53) for both reviewers. Nondiagnostic segments were excluded from this analysis. The corresponding specificities were 100% (238 of 238 for reviewer A) and 99.6% (237 of 238 for reviewer B). The interobserver agreement regarding the MR images for the assessment of thrombosis was high (kappa = 0.92). Non-contrast-enhanced MR venography using SPADE and FR-FBI is highly accurate and reproducible for diagnosing DVT. This is especially advantageous for patients who have received nonmagnetizing, metal implants during orthopedic surgery. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20572137     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Central Venous Disease.

Authors:  Justinas Silickas; Stephen A Black; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Adam M Gwozdz; Alberto Smith; Prakash Saha
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 2.  Advanced imaging in acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Gita Yashwantrao Karande; Sandeep S Hedgire; Yadiel Sanchez; Vinit Baliyan; Vishala Mishra; Suvranu Ganguli; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

3.  Magnetic resonance venography to assess thrombus resolution with edoxaban monotherapy versus parenteral anticoagulation/warfarin for symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: A multicenter feasibility study.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; Venkatesh Mani; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael A Grosso; Michele Mercuri; Hans J Lanz; Steven Schussler; Ching Hsu; Amy Chinigo; Bruce Ritchie; Venkatesh Nadar; Kevin Cannon; John Pullman; Mauricio Concha; Marlin Schul; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Usefulness of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging prior to venous interventions.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kusiak; Jacek Budzyński
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  Combined MR direct thrombus imaging and non-contrast magnetic resonance venography reveal the evolution of deep vein thrombosis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  I A Mendichovszky; A N Priest; D J Bowden; S Hunter; I Joubert; S Hilborne; M J Graves; T Baglin; D J Lomas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.