Literature DB >> 20572118

The 18-week fetal examination and detection of anomalies.

Sturla H Eik-Nes1.   

Abstract

From its beginning in the fifties the use of ultrasound in gynaecology and obstetrics has expanded extensively. Ultrasound technology has taken us from a time when the mother was our prime focus to the present where it is the unborn baby. Ultrasound assessments may have significant consequences for pregnancy care by optimizing the time, the mode and the location of the delivery as well as preparing the postnatal staff for a prenatally defined fetal problem. A major factor in the development was the groundbreaking work of an obstetrician, Ian Donald, and an engineer, Tom Brown, at Queen Mother's Hospital in Glasgow, who produced an ultrasound instrument called the Diasonograph. The first screening program offering a systematic ultrasound examination to a large pregnant population began in Malmoe, in 1973 and aimed to detect twins. Since then the examination has evolved over the years to include a systematic evaluation of the intrauterine contents. A number of randomized controlled trials have been reported and several large studies have reported the efficiency of routine fetal examinations for the detection of anomalies. Detection rates for the various subsets are presented. The learning curve regarding the ability to detect anomalies and the importance of proper training has also been shown. The procedure 'routine fetal examination' has been significant in supporting the continuous development of fetal medicine. The consequences of the improved dating of every pregnancy and the in utero transport of a sick fetus rather than an emergency transportation of a sick neonate, have an established evidence base. Ultrasound technology has had a remarkable ability to trigger great technical minds to move the technology forward year after year. Through a continuous cooperation between technicians and clinicians, this impressive technology of ultrasound will continue to support our work for the unborn child. (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20572118     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

Review 1.  Imaging clues in the prenatal diagnosis of syndromes and aneuploidy.

Authors:  Judy A Estroff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-06

2.  A qualitative study of the work experiences of midwives performing obstetric ultrasound in Norway.

Authors:  Magnhild Reiso; Berit Langli; Eva Sommerseth; Aud Johannessen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  First trimester anomaly scan using virtual reality (VR FETUS study): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C S Pietersma; A G M G J Mulders; L M Moolenaar; M G M Hunink; A H J Koning; S P Willemsen; A T J I Go; E A P Steegers; M Rousian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.