Literature DB >> 20571938

Taking evolution seriously in political science.

Orion Lewis1, Sven Steinmo.   

Abstract

In this essay, we explore the epistemological and ontological assumptions that have been made to make political science "scientific." We show how political science has generally adopted an ontologically reductionist philosophy of science derived from Newtonian physics and mechanics. This mechanical framework has encountered problems and constraints on its explanatory power, because an emphasis on equilibrium analysis is ill-suited for the study of political change. We outline the primary differences between an evolutionary ontology of social science and the physics-based philosophy commonly employed. Finally, we show how evolutionary thinking adds insight into the study of political phenomena and research questions that are of central importance to the field, such as preference formation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20571938     DOI: 10.1007/s12064-010-0097-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theory Biosci        ISSN: 1431-7613            Impact factor:   1.919


  3 in total

1.  The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions.

Authors:  Samuel Bowles; Jung-Kyoo Choi; Astrid Hopfensitz
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions.

Authors:  Ozgür Gürerk; Bernd Irlenbusch; Bettina Rockenbach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Daria Knoch; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Kaspar Meyer; Valerie Treyer; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.