Literature DB >> 20571262

The vascular stapler in uncinate process division during pancreaticoduodenectomy: technical considerations and results.

Melroy A D'souza1, Kailash Singh, Rohini V Hawaldar, Parul J Shukla, Shailesh V Shrikhande.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies describing the use of stapling devices for uncinate process division during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have data regarding outcomes. Our aim is to discuss our technique and the peri-operative outcomes with the use of the linear vascular stapler for division of the uncinate process during PD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 19 consecutive patients who underwent stapler division of the uncinate process ('stapler' group) were compared to 20 consecutive patients operated without stapler ('no-stapler' group).
RESULTS: The overall surgical morbidity in the no-stapler group was 25% (5/20) and 31.6% (6/19) in the stapler group (p = 0.731). The mean blood loss in the no-stapler group was 1,077.5 +/- 594 ml compared to 778 +/- 302 ml in the stapler group (p = 0.113). The mean operative duration was 498 +/- 105 min in the no-stapler group and 490 +/- 60 min in the stapler group (p = 0.773). The average number of lymph nodes retrieved was 6.1 +/- 3 in the no-stapler group versus 5.9 +/- 4 in the stapler group (p = 0.627). Neither group had positive resection margins.
CONCLUSION: Stapler division of the uncinate process for selected periampullary tumours compares well with the conventional method, has comparable peri-operative outcomes without compromising oncological radicality and has the potential to simplify uncinate resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20571262     DOI: 10.1159/000264674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  3 in total

1.  Superior mesenteric artery first combined with uncinate process approach versus uncinate process first approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative study evaluating perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; Yashodhan D Bodhankar; Kunal Suradkar; Guruprasad Shetty; Rohini Hawaldar; Mahesh Goel; Parul J Shukla
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Surgery for pancreatic carcinoma: state of the art.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal cancers in India: Treatment perspective.

Authors:  Nikhil Suresh Ghadyalpatil; Chopra Supriya; Patil Prachi; Dsouza Ashwin; Saklani Avanish
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.