Literature DB >> 20570642

Substrate stiffness and contractile behaviour modulate the functional maturation of osteoblasts on a collagen-GAG scaffold.

Michael B Keogh1, Fergal J O'Brien, Jacqueline S Daly.   

Abstract

Anchorage-dependent cells respond to the mechanical and physical properties of biomaterials. One such cue is the mechanical stiffness of a material. We compared the osteogenic potential of collagen-glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffolds with varying stiffness for up to 6 weeks in culture. The mechanical stiffness of CG scaffolds were varied by cross-linking by physical (dehydrothermal (DHT)) and chemical (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDAC) and glutaraldehyde (GLUT)) methods. The results showed that all CG substrates allowed cellular attachment, infiltration and osteogenic differentiation. CG scaffolds treated with EDAC and GLUT were mechanically stiffer, retained their original scaffold structure and resisted cellular contraction. Consequently, they facilitated a 2-fold greater cell number, probably due to the pore architecture being maintained, allowing improved diffusion of nutrients. On the other hand, the less stiff substrates cross-linked with DHT allowed increased cell-mediated scaffold contraction, contracting by 70% following 6 weeks (P < 0.01) of culture. This reduction in scaffold area resulted in cells reaching the centre of the scaffold quicker up to 4 weeks; however, at 6 weeks all scaffolds showed similar levels of cellular infiltration, with higher cell numbers found on the stiffer EDAC- and GLUT-treated scaffolds. Analysis of osteogenesis showed that scaffolds cross-linked with DHT expressed higher levels of the late stage bone formation markers osteopontin and osteocalcin (P < 0.01) and increased levels of mineralisation. In conclusion, the more compliant CG scaffolds allowed cell-mediated contraction and supported a greater level of osteogenic maturation of MC3T3 cells, while the stiffer, non-contractible scaffolds resulted in lower levels of cell maturation, but higher cell numbers on the scaffold. Therefore, we found scaffold stiffness had different effects on differentiation and cell number whereby the increased cell-mediated contraction facilitated by the less stiff scaffolds positively modulated osteoblast differentiation while reducing cell numbers.
Copyright © 2010 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20570642     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  21 in total

1.  A multilayer tissue engineered meniscus substitute.

Authors:  Albana Ndreu Halili; Nesrin Hasirci; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Collagen-GAG scaffold biophysical properties bias MSC lineage choice in the presence of mixed soluble signals.

Authors:  Steven R Caliari; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  The effect of substrate stiffness, thickness, and cross-linking density on osteogenic cell behavior.

Authors:  Conleth A Mullen; Ted J Vaughan; Kristen L Billiar; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Bioinspired Collagen Scaffolds in Cranial Bone Regeneration: From Bedside to Bench.

Authors:  Justine C Lee; Elizabeth J Volpicelli
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.933

5.  Development of a three-dimensional bone-like construct in a soft self-assembling peptide matrix.

Authors:  Núria Marí-Buyé; Tomás Luque; Daniel Navajas; Carlos E Semino
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Dissociated and Reconstituted Cartilage Microparticles in Densified Collagen Induce Local hMSC Differentiation.

Authors:  Tyler Novak; Benjamin Seelbinder; Celina M Twitchell; Sherry L Voytik-Harbin; Corey P Neu
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  Optimizing Collagen Scaffolds for Bone Engineering: Effects of Cross-linking and Mineral Content on Structural Contraction and Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Justine C Lee; Clifford T Pereira; Xiaoyan Ren; Weibiao Huang; David Bischoff; Daniel W Weisgerber; Dean T Yamaguchi; Brendan A Harley; Timothy A Miller
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 8.  Methodologies in creating skin substitutes.

Authors:  Mathew N Nicholas; Marc G Jeschke; Saeid Amini-Nik
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Mimicking the Hierarchical Organization of Natural Collagen: Toward the Development of Ideal Scaffolding Material for Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Luca Salvatore; Nunzia Gallo; Maria Lucia Natali; Alberta Terzi; Alessandro Sannino; Marta Madaghiele
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  Osteomimicry of mammary adenocarcinoma cells in vitro; increased expression of bone matrix proteins and proliferation within a 3D collagen environment.

Authors:  Rachel F Cox; Allan Jenkinson; Kerstin Pohl; Fergal J O'Brien; Maria P Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.