S Heres1, T Reichhart, J Hamann, R Mendel, S Leucht, W Kissling. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen, am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Moehlstrasse 26, 81675 Muenchen, Germany. s.heres@lrz.tum.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite good clinical evidence, depot antipsychotics are only seldom prescribed to patients with first episode schizophrenia. The present study aims at investigating psychiatrists' reasons for this reservation. METHOD: We surveyed 198 psychiatrists on their attitude toward offering depot treatment to first episode patients (FEP). Participants scored the extent of influence of individual factors on their decision on a seven-point-scale, additional data on their prescription practice and estimation of the relapse risk of FEP were collected. RESULTS: Psychiatrists reported that only three out of 12 factors were of influence. These were the limited availability of different second generation antipsychotic depot drugs, the frequent rejection of the depot offer by the patients and the patients' skepticism based on the lack in experience of a relapse. CONCLUSIONS: There is actually little specific reason for not prescribing depot to FEP according to the current survey. For those factors being reported to be of influence, psychoeducation, including profound information on depot treatment, the development of additional SGA depot drugs and the standard offer of depot treatment to all FEP in a shared-decision-making may be considered.
OBJECTIVE: Despite good clinical evidence, depot antipsychotics are only seldom prescribed to patients with first episode schizophrenia. The present study aims at investigating psychiatrists' reasons for this reservation. METHOD: We surveyed 198 psychiatrists on their attitude toward offering depot treatment to first episode patients (FEP). Participants scored the extent of influence of individual factors on their decision on a seven-point-scale, additional data on their prescription practice and estimation of the relapse risk of FEP were collected. RESULTS: Psychiatrists reported that only three out of 12 factors were of influence. These were the limited availability of different second generation antipsychotic depot drugs, the frequent rejection of the depot offer by the patients and the patients' skepticism based on the lack in experience of a relapse. CONCLUSIONS: There is actually little specific reason for not prescribing depot to FEP according to the current survey. For those factors being reported to be of influence, psychoeducation, including profound information on depot treatment, the development of additional SGA depot drugs and the standard offer of depot treatment to all FEP in a shared-decision-making may be considered.
Authors: Taishiro Kishimoto; Sohag Sanghani; Mark J Russ; Akeem N Marsh; Joshua Morris; Suparna Basu; Majnu John; John M Kane Journal: Int Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.659
Authors: Suzanne Law; Peter M Haddad; Imran B Chaudhry; Nusrat Husain; Richard J Drake; Robert J Flanagan; Anthony S David; Maxine X Patel Journal: Ther Adv Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-08