Lesley Stafford1, Fiona Judd. 1. Centre for Women's Mental Health, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Lesley.stafford@thewomens.org.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe long-term psychological morbidity, unmet supportive care needs, positive changes, sexual outcomes and relationship satisfaction in partners of gynaecologic cancer survivors, as compared with respective survivors. METHOD: Self-report measures were administered to a cross-sectional sample of 68 partners recruited via patient survivors. RESULTS: Rates of depression and anxiety among partners were 8.8% and 10.3%, respectively. Anxiety was higher among survivors than partners (P=0.003). Partners reported a mean of 3.25 unmet needs and 48.5% had at least one unmet need. At least one positive change was reported by 66.2% of partners. Greater number of unmet needs was the most important predictor of both anxiety (beta=0.39; P=0.001) and depression (beta=0.45; P<0.001). Poor relationship satisfaction independently predicted greater anxiety (beta=-0.28; P=0.01). Perceptions of relationship satisfaction did not differ within couples. Half of couples had been sexually active in the preceding month. Most reported no change in interest in physical contact (76.4%) or sex (70.6%), had excellent sexual function and high levels of satisfaction with sex life. Compared to partners, survivors perceived worse vaginal stenosis and dryness (both P=0.002) and worse satisfaction with (survivors') appearance (P<0.001). Partner outcomes were not associated with demographic variables or survivors' clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: The majority of partners reported excellent sexual outcomes and little perceived change since the survivors' diagnosis. The association between unmet needs and psychological morbidity suggests a useful target for further intervention. Despite methodological limitations, these data are novel and present a starting point for further investigation to improve outcomes for survivors and partners. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To describe long-term psychological morbidity, unmet supportive care needs, positive changes, sexual outcomes and relationship satisfaction in partners of gynaecologic cancer survivors, as compared with respective survivors. METHOD: Self-report measures were administered to a cross-sectional sample of 68 partners recruited via patient survivors. RESULTS: Rates of depression and anxiety among partners were 8.8% and 10.3%, respectively. Anxiety was higher among survivors than partners (P=0.003). Partners reported a mean of 3.25 unmet needs and 48.5% had at least one unmet need. At least one positive change was reported by 66.2% of partners. Greater number of unmet needs was the most important predictor of both anxiety (beta=0.39; P=0.001) and depression (beta=0.45; P<0.001). Poor relationship satisfaction independently predicted greater anxiety (beta=-0.28; P=0.01). Perceptions of relationship satisfaction did not differ within couples. Half of couples had been sexually active in the preceding month. Most reported no change in interest in physical contact (76.4%) or sex (70.6%), had excellent sexual function and high levels of satisfaction with sex life. Compared to partners, survivors perceived worse vaginal stenosis and dryness (both P=0.002) and worse satisfaction with (survivors') appearance (P<0.001). Partner outcomes were not associated with demographic variables or survivors' clinical characteristics. CONCLUSION: The majority of partners reported excellent sexual outcomes and little perceived change since the survivors' diagnosis. The association between unmet needs and psychological morbidity suggests a useful target for further intervention. Despite methodological limitations, these data are novel and present a starting point for further investigation to improve outcomes for survivors and partners. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jeanne Carter; Helen Huang; Dana M Chase; Joan L Walker; David Cella; Lari Wenzel Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Heide Götze; Michael Friedrich; Elmar Brähler; Georg Romer; Anja Mehnert; Jochen Ernst Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ingrid J Rowlands; Monika Janda; Loretta McKinnon; Penelope M Webb; Vanessa L Beesley Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Willemijn M Vermeer; Rinske M Bakker; Gemma G Kenter; Anne M Stiggelbout; Moniek M Ter Kuile Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Belle H de Rooij; Teresa Hagan Thomas; Kathryn E Post; Jane Flanagan; Nicole P M Ezendam; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Don S Dizon Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 4.442