Literature DB >> 20570232

Patients' preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment.

Tim H C Damen1, Esther W de Bekker-Grob, Marc A M Mureau, Marian B Menke-Pluijmers, Caroline Seynaeve, Stefan O P Hofer, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients' preferences are important determinants in the decision for a specific type of breast reconstruction (BR). Understanding their considerations in the decision for a specific type of BR can contribute to further improvement in patient counselling. We explored patients' preferences for three BR modalities in a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
METHODS: We approached 386 patients who had previously undergone a therapeutic (n=309) or prophylactic (n=79) mastectomy, of whom 247 had also undergone a BR. These women were asked to choose between hypothetical BR profiles that were characterised by six treatment attributes: (1) material used for reconstruction, (2) number and duration of operations, (3) short-term complication rate, (4) long-term complication rate, (5) aesthetic result and (6) waiting time. The relative importance of attributes and trade-offs that the patients were willing to make among them were analysed using a multinomial logit regression model.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 71%. All treatment characteristics proved important for patients to make their choices. Respondents generally expressed a preference for autologous material and an excellent aesthetic result, which had the biggest positive effect on preferences. Complication rates of 20-30% had a similar negative effect. In this DCE, autologous free flap BR fitted in best with patients' preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insight into the relative weight patients place on various aspects of BR and trade-offs they make among BR characteristics. In addition to understanding patients' considerations, professional assessment of the technical feasibility, acceptable risks and obtainable aesthetic result of different techniques will always remain crucial in deciding which technique is best suited for an individual patient.
Copyright © 2010 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20570232     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

Review 1.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Factors influencing the decision to pursue immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Philipp Wunschel; Erwin Heine; Luc J Strobbe
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  Patient Preferences for Breast Cancer Treatment Interventions: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Renata Leborato Guerra; Luciana Castaneda; Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de Albuquerque; Camila Belo Tavares Ferreira; Flávia de Miranda Corrêa; Ricardo Ribeiro Alves Fernandes; Liz Maria de Almeida
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Understanding Stakeholder Preference for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Hina Panchal; Melissa Pilewskie; Clara Lee; Shantanu N Razdan; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.532

Review 5.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.

Authors:  Hannah Collacott; Vikas Soekhai; Caitlin Thomas; Anne Brooks; Ella Brookes; Rachel Lo; Sarah Mulnick; Sebastian Heidenreich
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Patients' Preferences for Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Eva J Niers; J Jan B van Lanschot; Ewout W Steyerberg; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Daniela R Bien; Marion Danner; Vera Vennedey; Daniele Civello; Silvia M Evers; Mickaël Hiligsmann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Quality Measures in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Identifying Metrics to Improve Care.

Authors:  Jacob S Nasser; William H J Chung; Ryan A Gudal; Sandra V Kotsis; Adeyiza O Momoh; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-25

Review 10.  Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alison Pearce; Mark Harrison; Verity Watson; Deborah J Street; Kirsten Howard; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.883

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.