Literature DB >> 20570030

Medical dominance and neoliberalisation in maternal care provision: the evidence from Canada and Australia.

Cecilia Benoit1, Maria Zadoroznyj2, Helga Hallgrimsdottir3, Adrienne Treloar3, Kara Taylor3.   

Abstract

Since the 1970s, governments in many high-income countries have implemented a series of reforms in their health care systems to improve efficiency and effectiveness. Many of these reforms have been of a market-oriented character, involving the deregulation of key services, the creation of competitive markets, and the privatization of health and social care. Some scholars have argued that these "neoliberal" reforms have unseated the historical structural embeddedness of medicine, and in some cases even resulted in the proletarianisation of physicians. Other scholars have challenged this view, maintaining that medical hegemony continues to shape health care provision in most high-income countries. In this paper we examine how policy reforms may have altered medical dominance over maternity care in two comparatively similar countries - Canada and Australia. Our findings indicate that neoliberal reforms in these two countries have not substantially changed the historically hegemonic role medicine has played in maternity care provision. We discuss the implications of this outcome for the increased medicalisation of human reproduction. Crown Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20570030      PMCID: PMC4445451          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

1.  Medicalization, markets and consumers.

Authors:  Peter Conrad; Valerie Leiter
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2004

2.  Private care and public waiting.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Distributional impact of recent changes in private health insurance policies.

Authors:  Agnes Walker; Richard Percival; Linc Thurecht; James Pearse
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Obstetricians and midwives modus vivendi for current times.

Authors:  Edward W Weaver; Kenneth F Clark; Barbara A Vernon
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Living in the parallel universe in Australia: public Medicare and private hospitals.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  State authority, medical dominance, and trends in the regulation of the health professions: the Ontario case.

Authors:  D Coburn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  A ship upon a stormy sea: the medicalization of pregnancy.

Authors:  K K Barker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Researching patient-professional interactions.

Authors:  Mike Bury
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2004-01

9.  Projections of Australian obstetricians ceasing practice and the reasons.

Authors:  Alastair H MacLennan; Michael K Spencer
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Choice, continuity and control: changing midwifery, towards a sociological perspective.

Authors:  J Sandall
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.372

View more
  13 in total

1.  Sonographers' communication in obstetrics: Challenges to their professional role and practice in Australia.

Authors:  Samantha Thomas; Kate O'Loughlin; Jillian Clarke
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-11-02

2.  Privatisation & marketisation of post-birth care: the hidden costs for new mothers.

Authors:  Cecilia Benoit; Camille Stengel; Rachel Phillips; Maria Zadoroznyj; Sarah Berry
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-10-15

3.  Black, Asian and minority ethnic women's experiences of maternity services in the UK: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Jennifer MacLellan; Sarah Collins; Margaret Myatt; Catherine Pope; Wanja Knighton; Tanvi Rai
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.057

4.  Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Amy Monk; Mark Tracy; Maralyn Foureur; Celia Grigg; Sally Tracy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Beyond the hospital door: a retrospective, cohort study of associations between birthing in the public or private sector and women's postpartum care.

Authors:  Wendy Brodribb; Maria Zadoroznyj; Michelle Nesic; Sue Kruske; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Clinician Perspectives of Barriers to Effective Implementation of a Rapid Response System in an Academic Health Centre: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  John Rihari-Thomas; Michelle DiGiacomo; Jane Phillips; Phillip Newton; Patricia M Davidson
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-08-01

7.  Sonographers' level of autonomy in communication in Australian obstetric settings: Does it affect their professional identity?

Authors:  Samantha Thomas; Kate O'Loughlin; Jill Clarke
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-09

8.  The views of mothers and GPs about postpartum care in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Wendy Brodribb; Maria Zadoroznyj; Aimée Dane
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Availability and access in modern obstetric care: a retrospective population-based study.

Authors:  H M Engjom; N-H Morken; O F Norheim; K Klungsøyr
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  First point of contact physiotherapy; a qualitative study.

Authors:  Rob Goodwin; Fiona Moffatt; Paul Hendrick; Stephen Timmons; Neil Chadborn; Pip Logan
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.358

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.