Literature DB >> 20569854

Promises and pitfalls of recent advances in chemical means of preventing the spread of nosocomial infections by environmental surfaces.

Syed A Sattar1.   

Abstract

Hard, nonporous environmental surfaces in health care settings are now receiving due recognition for their role in the spread of several types of nosocomial pathogens. The corresponding increase in the means to decontaminate such surfaces to interrupt the spread of infections is leading to the marketing of a plethora of products and procedures, including the "green" variety, with varying claims of microbicidal activity, human and environmental safety, and materials compatibility. Limitations of the existing methods to assess environmental surface disinfectants and the regulations that govern their premarket registration make objective evaluations difficult. Label claims of many such products also do not reflect the realities of field use along with a strong tendency to focus on the "bug de jour." Furthermore, whereas wiping is often an integral part of environmental surface decontamination, products meant for the purpose are rarely assessed with the physical effect of wiping incorporated. Many "green" products possess neither the spectrum of microbicidal activity nor the speed of action essential for use in health care settings. In general, "self-sanitizing" surfaces being marketed actively these days require greater scrutiny for field-relevant microbicidal activity as well as the potential to enhance microbicide resistance. The widening use of environmental surface disinfectants is also raising concerns on their human and environmental safety at many levels along with the realization that routine surface disinfection procedures in health care settings are frequently inadequate and possibly counterproductive. All this points to an urgent review of the basic procedures for assessing existing and new environmental surface disinfectants for their microbicidal activity, label claims, registration requirements, overall safety, and routine practices of environmental surface decontamination. (c) 2010 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20569854     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.04.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  20 in total

1.  Development and application of a tool to assess laboratory hygiene in contained-use facilities.

Authors:  S A Rutjes; F Lodder-Verschoor; J P Tijssen; A M de Roda Husman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Hospital cleaning in the 21st century.

Authors:  S J Dancer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  The role of the healthcare environment in the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms: update on current best practices for containment.

Authors:  Roy F Chemaly; Sarah Simmons; Charles Dale; Shashank S Ghantoji; Maria Rodriguez; Julie Gubb; Julie Stachowiak; Mark Stibich
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Controlling hospital-acquired infection: focus on the role of the environment and new technologies for decontamination.

Authors:  Stephanie J Dancer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Infection control for norovirus.

Authors:  L Barclay; G W Park; E Vega; A Hall; U Parashar; J Vinjé; B Lopman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination.

Authors:  Ethan E Mann; Dipankar Manna; Michael R Mettetal; Rhea M May; Elisa M Dannemiller; Kenneth K Chung; Anthony B Brennan; Shravanthi T Reddy
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.887

7.  Fluorinated TiO₂ as an ambient light-activated virucidal surface coating material for the control of human norovirus.

Authors:  Geun Woo Park; Min Cho; Ezra L Cates; David Lee; Byung-Taek Oh; Jan Vinjé; Jae-Hong Kim
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 6.252

8.  Use of UV-C radiation to disinfect non-critical patient care items: a laboratory assessment of the Nanoclave Cabinet.

Authors:  Ginny Moore; Shanom Ali; Elaine A Cloutman-Green; Christina R Bradley; Martyn A C Wilkinson; John C Hartley; Adam P Fraise; A Peter R Wilson
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  A randomized trial to evaluate a launderable bed protection system for hospital beds.

Authors:  Edmond A Hooker; Steven Allen; Larry Gray; Cynthia Kaufman
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  The dynamics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exposure in a hospital model and the potential for environmental intervention.

Authors:  Nottasorn Plipat; Ian H Spicknall; James S Koopman; Joseph Ns Eisenberg
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.