Literature DB >> 20569712

Delays in fibrinolysis as primary reperfusion therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Seth W Glickman1, Charles B Cairns, Anita Y Chen, Eric D Peterson, Matthew T Roe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In contemporary practice, the degree to which fibrinolytic therapy is administered in a timely fashion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and its association with outcomes is not well-known. Our objective was to assess the performance of fibrinolytic therapy within the recommended 30-minute time frame for patients with STEMI.
METHODS: Patient characteristics associated with the timeliness of fibrinolytic therapy were evaluated. We also examined the association of timely fibrinolysis with key patient outcomes, including inpatient mortality, stroke, and cardiogenic shock. Logistic generalized estimating equations were used to account for baseline clinical factors and within-hospital clustering.
RESULTS: Between January 2007 and June 2008, 3,219 STEMI patients in 178 hospitals received primary fibrinolytic therapy. Median door-to-needle (DTN) time was 34.0 minutes (interquartile range 22.0-54.0 minutes). However, only 44.5% met the American College of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology guideline DTN time of < or =30 minutes. Patient characteristics associated with longer fibrinolysis times included female gender (+17.8% longer vs men, 95% CI 11.9-24.1) and age > or =75 (+12.0% longer vs age <55, 95% CI 1.8-23.2). Timely (vs delayed) fibrinolysis was associated with a decreased risk of a composite outcome of death, shock, or stroke (6.2% vs 8.8%, adjusted odds ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: Timely fibrinolytic therapy was associated with lower risk of a composite outcome of shock, death, or stroke, yet DTN times of < or =30 minutes were achieved in less than half of the patients studied. Thus, efforts to optimize regional systems of STEMI care should focus on shortening reperfusion times for patients who receive fibrinolysis, as well as those who receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20569712     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  5 in total

1.  Impact of type of thrombolytic agent on in-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in the Middle East.

Authors:  Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Amr Ali; Mohammad Zubaid; Prashanth Panduranga; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ahmed Abusham; Wael Almahmeed; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Haitham Amin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Frequency and determinants of timely arrival among patients of acute myocardial infarction at a public sector tertiary care hospital in Karachi.

Authors:  Faryal Akber Jalbani; Shiraz Shaikh; Subhani Fatima
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  Delay of Fibrinolysis in ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results of an Investigation Conducted in a Single Center in Sousse Tunisia.

Authors:  Hatem Bouraoui; Besma Trimeche; Samia Ernez Hajri; Abdallah Mahdhaoui; Meriem Ben Romdhane; Gouider Jeridi
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2014-07

4.  Is female gender associated with worse outcome after ST elevation myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Samad Ghaffari; Leili Pourafkari; Arezou Tajlil; Roza Bahmani-Oskoui; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-12-14

5.  Failure to improve door-to-needle time by switching to emergency physician-initiated thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Alexander Loch; Tint Lwin; Idzwan Mohd Zakaria; Imran Zainal Abidin; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.