Literature DB >> 20569385

Analysis of pea HMG-I/Y expression suggests a role in defence gene regulation.

Steven J Klosterman1, Jane J Choi, Lee A Hadwiger.   

Abstract

SUMMARY HMG-I/Y proteins are characterized by the presence of AT-hook motifs, DNA binding domains that recognize AT-rich tracts of DNA. By facilitating protein:protein and protein:DNA interactions in the vicinity of these AT-rich binding sites, HMG-I/Y positively or negatively regulates gene expression. Several pea defence gene promoters have AT-rich tracts of DNA that are potential targets for modulation via HMG-I/Y. In this study, a comparison of the expression of a pea defence gene (DRR206) mRNA relative to the expression of HMG-I/Y mRNA was monitored by Northern analysis following the inoculation of a fungal pathogen, Fusarium solani or treatment with chitosan and a F. solani DNase (Fsph DNase). In pea pod endocarp tissue, HMG-I/Y expression was observed at high levels in untreated tissue and at lower levels 6 h following inoculation or wounding of the tissue. Western blots with an antipea HMG-I/Y polyclonal antibody also revealed that pea HMG-I/Y is expressed at decreased levels 6 h following inoculation or elicitor treatment. HMG-I/Y extracted from pea caused alterations in the gel migration of radio-labelled AT-rich sequences from the pea DRR206 promoter, suggesting that similar interactions could exist in vivo. Agroinfiltration was utilized to express the pea HMG-I/Y gene in tobacco containing a chimeric gene fusion of a promoter from the PR gene, DRR206, and the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. Transient expression of pea HMG-I/Y led to a decrease in GUS reporter gene activity in the heterologous tobacco system. These data implicate pea HMG-I/Y abundance in the down-regulation of DRR206 gene expression, and possibly HMG-I/Y depletion in the expression of defence genes in pea.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 20569385     DOI: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol        ISSN: 1364-3703            Impact factor:   5.663


  7 in total

1.  The effect of chitosan-PMAA-NPK nanofertilizer on Pisum sativum plants.

Authors:  Noha S Khalifa; Mohammed N Hasaneen
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Anatomy of a nonhost disease resistance response of pea to Fusarium solani: PR gene elicitation via DNase, chitosan and chromatin alterations.

Authors:  Lee A Hadwiger
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  An RNA-Seq Analysis of Grape Plantlets Grown in vitro Reveals Different Responses to Blue, Green, Red LED Light, and White Fluorescent Light.

Authors:  Chun-Xia Li; Zhi-Gang Xu; Rui-Qi Dong; Sheng-Xin Chang; Lian-Zhen Wang; Muhammad Khalil-Ur-Rehman; Jian-Min Tao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Non-host Resistance: DNA Damage Is Associated with SA Signaling for Induction of PR Genes and Contributes to the Growth Suppression of a Pea Pathogen on Pea Endocarp Tissue.

Authors:  Lee A Hadwiger; Kiwamu Tanaka
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Agroinfiltration for transient gene expression and characterisation of fungal pathogen effectors in cool-season grain legume hosts.

Authors:  Johannes W Debler; Bernadette M Henares; Robert C Lee
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  DNA Damage and Chromatin Conformation Changes Confer Nonhost Resistance: A Hypothesis Based on Effects of Anti-cancer Agents on Plant Defense Responses.

Authors:  Lee A Hadwiger; Kiwamu Tanaka
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Dissecting the Role of Promoters of Pathogen-sensitive Genes in Plant Defense.

Authors:  Indrani Baruah; Gajendra Mohan Baldodiya; Jagajjit Sahu; Geetanjali Baruah
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.236

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.