Literature DB >> 20568665

A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics.

Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson1, William R Cannon, Christopher S Oehmen, Anuj R Shah, Vidhya Gurumoorthi, Mary S Lipton, Katrina M Waters.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The standard approach to identifying peptides based on accurate mass and elution time (AMT) compares profiles obtained from a high resolution mass spectrometer to a database of peptides previously identified from tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) studies. It would be advantageous, with respect to both accuracy and cost, to only search for those peptides that are detectable by MS (proteotypic).
RESULTS: We present a support vector machine (SVM) model that uses a simple descriptor space based on 35 properties of amino acid content, charge, hydrophilicity and polarity for the quantitative prediction of proteotypic peptides. Using three independently derived AMT databases (Shewanella oneidensis, Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia pestis) for training and validation within and across species, the SVM resulted in an average accuracy measure of approximately 0.83 with an SD of <0.038. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these results are achievable with a small set of 13 variables and can achieve high proteome coverage. AVAILABILITY: http://omics.pnl.gov/software/STEPP.php CONTACT: bj@pnl.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20568665     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  13 in total

Review 1.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Proteomic profiling of a layered tissue reveals unique glycolytic specializations of photoreceptor cells.

Authors:  Boris Reidel; J Will Thompson; Sina Farsiu; M Arthur Moseley; Nikolai P Skiba; Vadim Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Mining the human urine proteome for monitoring renal transplant injury.

Authors:  Tara K Sigdel; Yuqian Gao; Jintang He; Anyou Wang; Carrie D Nicora; Thomas L Fillmore; Tujin Shi; Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian; Oscar Salvatierra; David G Camp; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Prediction of missed proteolytic cleavages for the selection of surrogate peptides for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Craig Lawless; Simon J Hubbard
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-07-17

5.  CONSeQuence: prediction of reference peptides for absolute quantitative proteomics using consensus machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Claire E Eyers; Craig Lawless; David C Wedge; King Wai Lau; Simon J Gaskell; Simon J Hubbard
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Using PeptideAtlas, SRMAtlas, and PASSEL: Comprehensive Resources for Discovery and Targeted Proteomics.

Authors:  Ulrike Kusebauch; Eric W Deutsch; David S Campbell; Zhi Sun; Terry Farrah; Robert L Moritz
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-06-17

7.  Selected reaction monitoring to determine protein abundance in Arabidopsis using the Arabidopsis proteotypic predictor.

Authors:  Nicolas L Taylor; Ricarda Fenske; Ian Castleden; Tiago Tomaz; Clark J Nelson; A Harvey Millar
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Sequential projection pursuit principal component analysis--dealing with missing data associated with new -omics technologies.

Authors:  Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Melissa M Matzke; Thomas O Metz; Jason E McDermott; Hyunjoo Walker; Karin D Rodland; Joel G Pounds; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 9.  Review of software tools for design and analysis of large scale MRM proteomic datasets.

Authors:  Christopher M Colangelo; Lisa Chung; Can Bruce; Kei-Hoi Cheung
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  VESPA: software to facilitate genomic annotation of prokaryotic organisms through integration of proteomic and transcriptomic data.

Authors:  Elena S Peterson; Lee Ann McCue; Alexandra C Schrimpe-Rutledge; Jeffrey L Jensen; Hyunjoo Walker; Markus A Kobold; Samantha R Webb; Samuel H Payne; Charles Ansong; Joshua N Adkins; William R Cannon; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.