Literature DB >> 20568612

Community and species-specific responses of wild bees to insect pest control programs applied to a pollinator-dependent crop.

Julianna K Tuell1, Rufus Isaacs.   

Abstract

Wild bee conservation is regarded as essential for sustainable production of pollinator-dependent crops, yet little is known about the effects on wild bee communities of typical insect pest management programs used postbloom. We developed an insecticide program risk (IPR) index to quantify the relative risk to wild bees of insecticide programs applied to blueberry fields. This was used to determine the relationship between IPR and the abundance, diversity, and richness of wild bee communities sampled during three successive flowering seasons. In 2 of 3 yr, bee abundance and species richness declined with increasing IPR. Bee diversity declined with IPR in one of 3 yr. These results indicate that wild bee communities are negatively affected by increasingly intensive chemical pest management activities in crop fields and that interyear variability in bee populations has the potential to mask such effects in short-term studies. When several wild bee species were analyzed separately, two of three solitary and one of three social blueberry-foraging species declined with increasing IPR values, suggesting that different life histories and nesting habits may help some bee populations escape the negative effects of insecticides applied after bloom. Pollinator conservation programs aimed strictly at reducing insecticide use may have varying success, depending on the biology of the target bee species. The IPR index provides a standard method to compare pest management programs for their potential effect on wild bee communities, with broad application for use in other agricultural systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20568612     DOI: 10.1603/ec09314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Exotic species enhance response diversity to land-use change but modify functional composition.

Authors:  Jamie R Stavert; David E Pattemore; Anne C Gaskett; Jacqueline R Beggs; Ignasi Bartomeus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Negative effects of pesticides on wild bee communities can be buffered by landscape context.

Authors:  Mia G Park; E J Blitzer; Jason Gibbs; John E Losey; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992-2009.

Authors:  Nicholas W Calderone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pesticide residues in daily bee pollen samples (April-July) from an intensive agricultural region in Southern Germany.

Authors:  Carolin Friedle; Klaus Wallner; Peter Rosenkranz; Dieter Martens; Walter Vetter
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.