Literature DB >> 20568083

Ovine bone- and marrow-derived progenitor cells and their potential for scaffold-based bone tissue engineering applications in vitro and in vivo.

Johannes C Reichert1, Maria A Woodruff, Thor Friis, Verena M C Quent, Stan Gronthos, Georg N Duda, Michael A Schütz, Dietmar W Hutmacher.   

Abstract

Recently, research has focused on bone marrow derived multipotent mesenchymal precursor cells (MPC) and osteoblasts (OB) for clinical use in bone engineering. Prior to clinical application, cell based treatment concepts need to be evaluated in preclinical, large animal models. Sheep in particular are considered a valid model for orthopaedic and trauma related research. However, only sheep aged > 6 years show secondary osteon formation characteristic of human bone. Osteogenic cells isolated from animals of this age group remain poorly characterized. In the present study, ex vivo expanded MPC isolated from ovine bone marrow proliferated at a higher rate than OB derived from tibial compact bone as assessed in standard 2D cultures. MPC expressed the respective phenotypic profile typical for different mesenchymal cell populations (CD14(-)/CD31(-)/CD45(-)/CD29(+)/CD44(+)/CD166(+)) and showed a multilineage differentiation potential. When compared to OB, MPC had a higher mineralization potential under standard osteogenic culture conditions and expressed typical bone related markers such as osteocalcin, osteonectin and type I collagen at the mRNA and protein level. After 4 weeks in 3D culture, MPC constructs demonstrated higher cell density and mineralization, whilst cell viability on the scaffolds was assessed > 90%. Cells displayed a spindle-like morphology and formed interconnected networks. In contrast, when implanted subcutaneously into NOD/SCID mice, MPC presented a lower osteogenic potential than OB. In summary, this study provides a detailed characterisation of ovine MPC and OB from a bone engineering perspective and suggests that MPC and OB provide promising means for future bone disease related treatment applications.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20568083     DOI: 10.1002/term.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  12 in total

1.  Biomimetic Scaffolds for Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Kameron S Rezzadeh; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Receptors Clin Investig       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  A humanized tissue-engineered in vivo model to dissect interactions between human prostate cancer cells and human bone.

Authors:  Parisa Hesami; Boris M Holzapfel; Anna Taubenberger; Martine Roudier; Ladan Fazli; Shirly Sieh; Laure Thibaudeau; Laura S Gregory; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Judith A Clements
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Cell sourcing for bone tissue engineering: amniotic fluid stem cells have a delayed, robust differentiation compared to mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Alexandra Peister; Maria A Woodruff; Jarod J Prince; Derwin P Gray; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.020

4.  Synergistic effect of Indian hedgehog and bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene transfer to increase the osteogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Jonas Schmalzl; Patrick Prager; Fabian Gilbert; Verena M C Quent; Andre F Steinert; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.832

5.  Dental pulp-derived stromal cells exhibit a higher osteogenic potency than bone marrow-derived stromal cells in vitro and in a porcine critical-size bone defect model.

Authors:  Jonas Jensen; Claus Tvedesøe; Jan Hendrik Duedal Rölfing; Casper Bindzus Foldager; Helle Lysdahl; David Christian Evar Kraft; Muwan Chen; Jorgen Baas; Dang Quang Svend Le; Cody Eric Bünger
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-04-20

6.  Ovine Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Morphologic, Phenotypic and Functional Characterization for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Clara Sanjurjo-Rodríguez; Rocío Castro-Viñuelas; Tamara Hermida-Gómez; Tania Fernández-Vázquez; Isaac Manuel Fuentes-Boquete; Francisco Javier de Toro-Santos; Silvia María Díaz-Prado; Francisco Javier Blanco-García
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bone regeneration with osteogenic matrix cell sheet and tricalcium phosphate: An experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Tsutomu Kira; Manabu Akahane; Shohei Omokawa; Takamasa Shimizu; Kenji Kawate; Tadanobu Onishi; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-10-18

8.  Substantial differences between human and ovine mesenchymal stem cells in response to osteogenic media: how to explain and how to manage?

Authors:  Ilona Kalaszczynska; Slawomir Ruminski; Anna E Platek; Igor Bissenik; Piotr Zakrzewski; Maria Noszczyk; Malgorzata Lewandowska-Szumiel
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2013-10

9.  The effect of bone allografts combined with bone marrow stromal cells on the healing of segmental bone defects in a sheep model.

Authors:  Marco Bernardo C Fernandes; João Antônio Matheus Guimarães; Priscila Ladeira Casado; Amanda dos Santos Cavalcanti; Natalia N Gonçalves; Carlos E Ambrósio; Fernando Rodrigues; Ana Carolina F Pinto; Maria Angélica Miglino; Maria Eugênia L Duarte
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Different Culture Media Affect Proliferation, Surface Epitope Expression, and Differentiation of Ovine MSC.

Authors:  Carina Adamzyk; Tanja Emonds; Julia Falkenstein; René Tolba; Wilhelm Jahnen-Dechent; Bernd Lethaus; Sabine Neuss
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.