Literature DB >> 20567824

Efficacy and tolerability of hydroxyurea in the treatment of the hyperproliferative manifestations of myelofibrosis: results in 40 patients.

Alejandra Martínez-Trillos1, Anna Gaya, Margherita Maffioli, Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo, Xavier Calvo, Marina Díaz-Beyá, Francisco Cervantes.   

Abstract

Hydroxyurea (HU) is frequently given as treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), but data on its efficacy and tolerability are scarce. The results of HU therapy were evaluated in 40 patients with hyperproliferative manifestations of primary (n = 32), post-polycythemia vera (n = 6), or post-essential thrombocythemia (n = 2) myelofibrosis. Median interval between diagnosis and HU start was 6.2 months (range 0-141.7). Reasons for treatment were constitutional symptoms (55%), symptomatic splenomegaly (45%), thrombocytosis (40%), leukocytosis (28%), pruritus (10%), and bone pain (8%). The starting dose was 500 mg/day, subsequently adjusted to the individual efficacy and tolerability. Response was bone pain 100%, constitutional symptoms 82%, pruritus 50%, splenomegaly 40%, and anemia 12.5%. According to the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment criteria, clinical improvement was achieved in 16 patients (40%). Median duration of response was 13.2 months (range 3-126.2). Worsening of the anemia or appearance of pancytopenia were observed in 18 patients, requiring administration of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (n = 17) and/or danazol (n = 9). Oral or leg ulcers appeared in five patients and one had gastrointestinal symptoms. HU is an effective and generally well-tolerated therapy for the hyperproliferative manifestations of MF. The accentuation of the anemia often induced by HU is usually manageable with concomitant treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567824     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-1019-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  31 in total

1.  Splenic irradiation provides transient palliation for symptomatic splenomegaly associated with primary myelofibrosis: a report on 14 patients.

Authors:  Akira Kitanaka; Katsuto Takenaka; Kotaro Shide; Toshihiro Miyamoto; Tadakazu Kondo; Keiya Ozawa; Mineo Kurokawa; Koichi Akashi; Kazuya Shimoda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  JAK2 inhibitors: what's the true therapeutic potential?

Authors:  Fabio P S Santos; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Philadelphia-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: critical concepts and management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi; Gunnar Birgegard; Francisco Cervantes; Guido Finazzi; Martin Griesshammer; Claire Harrison; Hans Carl Hasselbalch; Rudiger Hehlmann; Ronald Hoffman; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Nicolaus Kröger; Ruben Mesa; Mary F McMullin; Animesh Pardanani; Francesco Passamonti; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Andreas Reiter; Richard T Silver; Srdan Verstovsek; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Parameswaran Hari; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Myelofibrosis: an update on drug therapy in 2016.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.889

6.  Austrian recommendations for the management of primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: an expert statement.

Authors:  Thamer Sliwa; Christine Beham-Schmid; Sonja Burgstaller; Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch; Günther Gastl; Klaus Geissler; Maria Krauth; Peter Krippl; Alois Lang; Andreas Petzer; Stefan Wöhrer; Albert Wölfler; Heinz Gisslinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 7.  The new landscape of therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Krisstina Gowin; Robyn Emanuel; Holly Geyer; Ruben A Mesa
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Comparison of placebo and best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis in the phase 3 COMFORT studies.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Srdan Verstovsek; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Jason Gotlib; Heinz Gisslinger; Richard Levy; Andres Siulnik; Vikas Gupta; Mahmudul Khan; John F DiPersio; Mari McQuitty; John V Catalano; Deborah S Hunter; Laurent Knoops; Michael Deininger; Francisco Cervantes; Carole Miller; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Richard T Silver; Tiziano Barbui; Moshe Talpaz; Giovanni Barosi; Elliott F Winton; Estella Mendeson; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian; Claire Harrison
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Emerging therapeutic options for myelofibrosis: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Lynda Foltz; Shireen Sirhan; Lambert Busque; A Robert Turner
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2012-09-23

Review 10.  Modern management of splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Douglas Tremblay; Myron Schwartz; Richard Bakst; Rahul Patel; Thomas Schiano; Marina Kremyanskaya; Ronald Hoffman; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.