Literature DB >> 20567173

Characteristics of planned and unplanned home births in 19 States.

Eugene Declercq1, Marian F MacDorman, Fay Menacker, Naomi Stotland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the differences in the characteristics of mothers having planned and unplanned home births that occurred at home in a 19-state reporting area in the United States in 2006.
METHODS: Data are from the 2006 U.S. vital statistics natality file. Information on whether a home birth was planned or unplanned was available from 19 states, representing 49% of all home births nationally. Data were examined by maternal age, race or ethnicity, education, marital status, live birth order, birthplace of mother, gestational age, prenatal care, smoking status, state, population of county of residence, and birth attendant. We could not identify planned home births that resulted in a transfer to the hospital.
RESULTS: Of the 11,787 home births with planning status recorded in the 19 states studied here, 9,810 (83.2%) were identified as planned home births. The proportion of all births that occurred at home that were planned varied from 54% to 98% across states. Unplanned home births are more likely to involve mothers who are non-white, younger, unmarried, foreign-born, smokers, not college-educated, and with no prenatal care. Unplanned home births are also more likely to be preterm and to be attended by someone who is neither a doctor nor a midwife and is listed as either "other" or "unknown."
CONCLUSION: Planned and unplanned home births differ substantially in characteristics, and distinctions need to be drawn between the two in subsequent analyses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20567173     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e21f6d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes and risk factors for unplanned delivery at home and before arrival to the hospital.

Authors:  Zlatko Lazić; Iztok Takač
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Safe and healthy birth: the importance of data.

Authors:  Amy M Romano
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

3.  Expert workshop assesses the significance of birth location on maternal and infant outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy Gordon
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

4.  Association Between Loss of Hospital-Based Obstetric Services and Birth Outcomes in Rural Counties in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Peiyin Hung; Carrie Henning-Smith; Michelle M Casey; Shailendra Prasad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Where Do You Feel Safest? Demographic Factors and Place of Birth.

Authors:  Mickey Sperlich; Cynthia Gabriel; Julia Seng
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Epidemiology of unplanned out-of-hospital births attended by paramedics.

Authors:  Gayle McLelland; Lisa McKenna; Amee Morgans; Karen Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Frequency and Content of Prenatal Care Determine Birth Place: A Community Based Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Can Oner; Binali Catak
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Why are babies born before arrival at health facilities in King Sabata Dalindyebo Local Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Adeyinka A Alabi; Don O'Mahony; Graham Wright; Mohlomi J Ntsaba
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2015-11-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.