Literature DB >> 20566891

Assessing the climatic benefits of black carbon mitigation.

Robert E Kopp1, Denise L Mauzerall.   

Abstract

To limit mean global warming to 2 degrees C, a goal supported by more than 100 countries, it will likely be necessary to reduce emissions not only of greenhouse gases but also of air pollutants with high radiative forcing (RF), particularly black carbon (BC). Although several recent research papers have attempted to quantify the effects of BC on climate, not all these analyses have incorporated all the mechanisms that contribute to its RF (including the effects of BC on cloud albedo, cloud coverage, and snow and ice albedo, and the optical consequences of aerosol mixing) and have reported their results in different units and with different ranges of uncertainty. Here we attempt to reconcile their results and present them in uniform units that include the same forcing factors. We use the best estimate of effective RF obtained from these results to analyze the benefits of mitigating BC emissions for achieving a specific equilibrium temperature target. For a 500 ppm CO(2)e (3.1 W m(-2)) effective RF target in 2100, which would offer about a 50% chance of limiting equilibrium warming to 2.5 degrees C above preindustrial temperatures, we estimate that failing to reduce carbonaceous aerosol emissions from contained combustion would require CO(2) emission cuts about 8 years (range of 1-15 years) earlier than would be necessary with full mitigation of these emissions.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20566891      PMCID: PMC2900637          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909605107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Effects of externally-through-internally-mixed soot inclusions within clouds and precipitation on global climate.

Authors:  Mark Z Jacobson
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Source attribution of black carbon in Arctic snow.

Authors:  Dean A Hegg; Stephen G Warren; Thomas C Grenfell; Sarah J Doherty; Timothy V Larson; Antony D Clarke
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: formidable challenges ahead.

Authors:  V Ramanathan; Y Feng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Mixing states of aerosols over four environmentally distinct atmospheric regimes in Asia: coastal, urban, and industrial locations influenced by dust.

Authors:  S Ramachandran; Rohit Srivastava
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Household light makes global heat: high black carbon emissions from kerosene wick lamps.

Authors:  Nicholas L Lam; Yanju Chen; Cheryl Weyant; Chandra Venkataraman; Pankaj Sadavarte; Michael A Johnson; Kirk R Smith; Benjamin T Brem; Joseph Arineitwe; Justin E Ellis; Tami C Bond
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Emission reduction of black carbon and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.

Authors:  Balram Ambade; Sudarshan Kurwadkar; Tapan Kumar Sankar; Amit Kumar
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.763

4.  Relationship between air pollutants and economic development of the provincial capital cities in China during the past decade.

Authors:  Yunpeng Luo; Huai Chen; Qiu'an Zhu; Changhui Peng; Gang Yang; Yanzheng Yang; Yao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.