Literature DB >> 20566655

Effect of surface wettability and topography on the adhesion of osteosarcoma cells on plasma-modified polystyrene.

Denis P Dowling1, Ian S Miller, Malika Ardhaoui, William M Gallagher.   

Abstract

Biomaterials interact with the biological environment at their surface, making accurate biophysical characterization of the surface crucially important for understanding subsequent biological effects. In this study, the surface of polystyrene (PS) was systematically altered in order to determine the effect of plasma treatment and surface roughness on cell adhesion and spreading. Surfaces with water contact angle from hydrophilic (12°) to superhydrophobic (155°) were obtained through a combination of modifying surface roughness (R (a)), the deposition of siloxane coatings and the fluorination of the PS surface. R (a) values in the range of 19-2365 nm were obtained by grinding the PS surface. The nanometer-thick siloxane coatings were deposited using an atmospheric pressure plasma system, while the fluorination of the PS was carried out using a low-pressure radio frequency (RF) plasma. The siloxane coatings were obtained using a liquid poly(dimethylsiloxane) precursor that was nebulized into helium or helium/oxygen plasmas. Water contact angles in the range of 12-122° were obtained with these coatings. Cell adhesion studies were carried out using human MG63 osteosarcoma cells. It was observed that higher polymer surface roughness enhanced cell adhesion, but had a negative effect on cell spreading. Optimum cell adhesion was observed at ∼64° for the siloxane coatings, with a decrease in adhesion observed for the more hydrophilic and hydrophobic coatings. This decrease in cell adhesion with an increase in hydrophobicity was also observed for the fluorinated PS surfaces with water contact angles in the range of 110-155°.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20566655     DOI: 10.1177/0885328210372148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Appl        ISSN: 0885-3282            Impact factor:   2.646


  45 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of cell-material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials.

Authors:  Maurizio Ventre; Filippo Causa; Paolo A Netti
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Micromilling: a method for ultra-rapid prototyping of plastic microfluidic devices.

Authors:  David J Guckenberger; Theodorus E de Groot; Alwin M D Wan; David J Beebe; Edmond W K Young
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  Flat and microstructured polymeric membranes in organs-on-chips.

Authors:  Thijs Pasman; Dirk Grijpma; Dimitrios Stamatialis; Andreas Poot
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Piyush Bajaj; Ryan M Schweller; Ali Khademhosseini; Jennifer L West; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Graphene Foam as a three-dimensional Platform for Myotube Growth.

Authors:  Eric Krueger; A Nicole Chang; Dale Brown; Josh Eixenberger; Raquel Brown; Sepideh Rastegar; Katie M Yocham; Kurtis D Cantley; David Estrada
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-06-24

6.  Fabrication and characterization of thiol-triacrylate polymer via Michael addition reaction for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Anoosha Forghani; Leah Garber; Cong Chen; Fariborz Tavangarian; Timothy B Tighe; Ram Devireddy; John A Pojman; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 7.  Superhydrophobic materials for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Eric J Falde; Stefan T Yohe; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Effects of the polymeric niche on neural stem cell characteristics during primary culturing.

Authors:  Stefan Haubenwallner; Matthias Katschnig; Ulrike Fasching; Silke Patz; Christa Trattnig; Natascha Andraschek; Gerda Grünbacher; Markus Absenger; Stephan Laske; Clemens Holzer; Werner Balika; Manuela Wagner; Ute Schäfer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of PMMA/high-load HA/carbon nanostructures bone cement formulations.

Authors:  Gil Gonçalves; María-Teresa Portolés; Cecilia Ramírez-Santillán; María Vallet-Regí; Ana Paula Serro; José Grácio; Paula A A P Marques
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Production of new 3D scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration by rapid prototyping.

Authors:  R Fradique; T R Correia; S P Miguel; K D de Sá; D R Figueira; A G Mendonça; I J Correia
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.