Literature DB >> 20566014

Predictors of early urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy.

Daniel J Lee1, Philippa Cheetham, Ketan K Badani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify predictors of early urinary continence after robot-assisted prostatectomy (RARP) in men who underwent a posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed in 107 consecutive men who underwent RARP by a single surgeon in an academic center. Men were excluded if they received adjuvant radiation therapy (7 men), were lost to follow up (4), or did not have a posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction (8 men). Eighty-eight men received a posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction and were followed in this study. Patient demographic and postoperative urinary control was recorded at interval follow up visits by the physician and research staff. Level of comorbidity was measured with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CACI). Preoperative urinary function was measured using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Continence was defined as men using zero pads per day.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight men with a mean age of 59.2 years (43.1-77.6) were followed for a median of 7.6 (range 1.5-16.7) months. The median preoperative PSA and IPSS was 5.0 ng/mL (range 0.95 ng/mL-23 ng/mL) and 8 (range 0-30), respectively. Overall, 91% of the men achieved continence with a median time to continence of 2.3 months. Of those, 50% achieved continence by 6 weeks. Men continent at 6 weeks were significantly younger, had lower IPSS scores, and less comorbidities (p = 0.01). Age (OR = 0.91, p < 0.01) and higher IPSS scores (OR = 0.28, p = 0.03) were associated with decreased odds of achieving continence at 6 weeks. The presence of coexisting disease was not predictive of continence return. After adjusting for comorbidity, body mass index (BMI), nerve sparing, and IPSS score, only age remained as an independent predictor of early continence (OR = 0.90, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we found that increased age and increased lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) severity are associated with decreased odds of achieving continence 6 weeks after RARP. Patient age remains the strongest predictor of early return of continence in a multivariate model. These factors should be used in counseling prior to surgery to meet realistic patient expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20566014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  11 in total

1.  Simple vs six-branches autologous suburethral sling during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early urinary continence recovery: prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Andrea Cestari; Matteo Ferrari; Mattia Sangalli; Matteo Zanoni; Massimo Ghezzi; Fabio Fabbri; Francesco Sozzi; Carolina Lolli; Vincenzo Dell'Acqua; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-11

2.  Impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length measured by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wan Song; Chan Kyo Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Alina Camacho Noriega; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Marc Bienz; Naif Alhathal; Mathieu Latour; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Independent predictors of recovery of continence 3 months after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jung Jun Kim; Yun-Sok Ha; Jeong Hyun Kim; Seong Soo Jeon; Dong-Hyeon Lee; Wun-Jae Kim; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Improvement in early urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic features: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Akihiro Nakane; Hiroki Kubota; Yusuke Noda; Tomoki Takeda; Yasuhiko Hirose; Atsushi Okada; Kentaro Mizuno; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Yutaro Hayashi; Takahiro Yasui
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Prediction of Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Development and Validation of a 24-Month Incontinence Nomogram.

Authors:  Ruben M Pinkhasov; Timothy Lee; Rogerio Huang; Bonnie Berkley; Alexandr M Pinkhasov; Nicole Dodge; Matthew S Loecher; Gaybrielle James; Elena Pop; Kristopher Attwood; James L Mohler
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Retrotrigonal muscular layer sling associated with total anatomical reconstruction in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and early continence.

Authors:  Matteo Luigi Zanoni; Fabio Grizzi; Davide Maffei; Paolo Vota; Nicola Frego; Giovanni Toia; Cinzia Mazzieri; Massimo Lazzeri; Nicolò Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Paolo Casale; Alberto Saita; Giorgio Guazzoni; Alberto Mandressi; Gianluigi Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-03

9.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following transurethral resection of the prostate: perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Chi-Feng Hung; Cheng-Kuang Yang; Yen-Chuan Ou
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2014-06-30

10.  Factors affecting urinary incontinence during robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Hajiha; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.