Literature DB >> 20565212

Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?

Stephan Lewandowsky1, Sonja M Geiger, Daniel B Morrell, Klaus Oberauer.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of the duration and type of to-be-articulated distractors during encoding of a verbal list into short-term memory (STM). Distractors and to-be-remembered items alternated during list presentation, as in the complex-span task that underlies much of working-memory research. According to an interference model of STM, known as serial order in a box (SOB; Farrell & Lewandowsky, 2002), additional repeated articulations of the same word between list items should cause minimal further disruption of encoding into STM even though the retention interval for early list items is increased. SOB also predicts that the articulation of several different distractor items should lead to much enhanced disruption if the distractor interval is increased. Those predictions were qualitatively confirmed in 4 experiments that found that it is the type of distractors, not their total duration, that determines the success of encoding a list into STM. The results pose a challenge to temporal models of complex-span performance, such as the time-based resource sharing model (Barrouillet, Bernardin, & Camos, 2004). The results add to a growing body of evidence that memory for the short term is not exclusively governed by purely temporal processes. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565212     DOI: 10.1037/a0019764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

Review 1.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Response suppression contributes to recency in serial recall.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

3.  Modeling working memory: a computational implementation of the Time-Based Resource-Sharing theory.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

4.  Sequential dependencies in recall of sequences: filling in the blanks.

Authors:  Simon Farrell; Mark J Hurlstone; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

5.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

6.  The role of physical digit representation and numerical magnitude representation in children's multiplication fact retrieval.

Authors:  Alice De Visscher; Marie-Pascale Noël; Bert De Smedt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-07-25

7.  Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

8.  A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference.

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

9.  Fractionating the Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Working Memory: Independent Effects of Dopamine and Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Sean James Fallon; Rozemarijn Margaretha Mattiesing; Kinan Muhammed; Sanjay Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Two systems of maintenance in verbal working memory: evidence from the word length effect.

Authors:  Gérôme Mora; Valérie Camos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.