Literature DB >> 20565207

The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion.

Elisah Dhooge1, Robert J Hartsuiker.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments, subjects named pictures with low- or high-frequency superimposed distractor words. In a 1st experiment, we replicated the finding that low-frequency words induce more interference in picture naming than high-frequency words (i.e., distractor frequency effect; Miozzo & Caramazza, 2003). According to the response exclusion hypothesis, this effect has its origin at a postlexical stage and is related to a response buffer. The account predicts that the distractor frequency effect should only be present when a response to the word enters the response buffer. This was tested by masking the distractor (Experiment 2) and by presenting it at various time points before stimulus onset (Experiment 3). Results supported the hypothesis by showing that the effect was only present when distractors were visible, and if they were presented in close proximity to the target picture. These results have implications for the models of lexical access and for the tasks that can be used to study this process. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565207     DOI: 10.1037/a0019128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion.

Authors:  Elisah Dhooge; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

2.  A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-28

3.  A novel multi-word paradigm for investigating semantic context effects in language production.

Authors:  Cornelia van Scherpenberg; Rasha Abdel Rahman; Hellmuth Obrig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Megan Mott; Gabriela Meade; Phillip J Holcomb; Katherine J Midgley
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Lexical Retrieval is not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Paul Del Prato; Francesca Peressotti; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Ardi Roelofs; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

7.  Bilingual picture-word studies constrain theories of lexical selection.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-29

8.  Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors.

Authors:  Markus F Damian; Katharina Spalek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-20

9.  Distinct patterns of brain activity characterise lexical activation and competition in spoken word production.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Ardi Roelofs; Ole Jensen; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Mathilde Bonnefond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon; Anna Lorenzoni; Francesca Peressotti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.