Literature DB >> 20565203

Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention.

Gerald Matthews1, Joel S Warm, Lauren E Reinerman-Jones, Lisa K Langheim, David A Washburn, Lloyd Tripp.   

Abstract

Loss of vigilance may lead to impaired performance in various applied settings including military operations, transportation, and industrial inspection. Individuals differ considerably in sustained attention, but individual differences in vigilance have proven to be hard to predict. The dependence of vigilance on workload factors is consistent with a resource model of sustained attention. Thus, measures of attentional resource availability may predict the operator's subsequent vigilance performance. In this study, we investigated whether a diagnostic battery of measures of response to a cognitive challenge would predict subsequent sustained attention. Measures that may relate to the mobilization of resources in response to task demands include subjective task engagement and coping, and a novel psychophysiological index, cerebral bloodflow velocity (CBFV). A two-phase design was used. First, participants were exposed to a challenging battery of short tasks that elevated CBFV. Second, participants performed a 36-min vigilance task. Two subgroups of participants performed either a sensory vigilance (N = 187) or a cognitive vigilance (N = 107) task. Measures of task engagement, coping, and CBFV response to the short task battery were compared as predictors of subsequent vigilance. Both subjective and CBFV indices of energization predicted sensory and cognitive vigilance, consistent with resource theory. Structural equation modeling was used to develop a latent factor model of influences on sustained attention. It is concluded that measures of resources, conceptualized as multiple energization processes, are potentially useful for diagnostic monitoring in applied settings. Use of a diagnostic task battery in military and transportation settings is discussed, along with some potential limitations on validity of the diagnostic test. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565203     DOI: 10.1037/a0019572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  16 in total

1.  Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.

Authors:  James Head; Paul N Russell; Martin J Dorahy; Ewald Neumann; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cerebral hemovelocity reveals differential resource allocation strategies for extraverts and introverts during vigilance.

Authors:  Tyler H Shaw; Cynthia Nguyen; Kelly Satterfield; Raul Ramirez; Patrick E McKnight
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Passive perceptual learning versus active searching in a novel stimuli vigilance task.

Authors:  James Head; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance.

Authors:  William S Helton; Paul N Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dual-task interference between climbing and a simulated communication task.

Authors:  Kathryn A Darling; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement.

Authors:  Hayden A Ross; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving: discriminating styles of workload regulation and their safety impacts.

Authors:  Dyani J Saxby; Gerald Matthews; Joel S Warm; Edward M Hitchcock; Catherine Neubauer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2013-09-16

10.  Frontal cerebral oxygen response as an indicator of initial attention effort during perceptual learning.

Authors:  Michael Ong; Paul N Russell; William S Helton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.