Literature DB >> 20565007

Area disadvantage and intimate partner homicide: an ecological analysis of North Carolina counties, 2004-2006.

Aubrey Spriggs Madkour1, Sandra L Martin, Carolyn Tucker Halpern, Victor J Schoenbach.   

Abstract

Using data from the North Carolina Violent Death Reporting System and other sources, we examined ecologic relationships between county (n = 100) disadvantage and intimate partner homicide (IPH), variability by victim gender and county urbanicity, and potential mediators. County disadvantage was related to female-victim homicide only in metropolitan counties (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.25); however, disadvantage was associated with male-victim IPH regardless of county urbanicity (IRR 1.17). None of the potential intervening variables examined (shelter availability, intimate partner violence services' funding) was supported as a mediator. Results suggest disparities across North Carolina counties in IPH according to county disadvantage. Future research should explore other potential mediators (i.e., service accessibility and law enforcement responses), as well as test the robustness of findings using additional years of data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20565007      PMCID: PMC2891556          DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Vict        ISSN: 0886-6708


  10 in total

1.  Surveillance for homicide among intimate partners--United States, 1981-1998.

Authors:  L J Paulozzi; L E Saltzman; M P Thompson; P Holmgreen
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  2001-10-12

2.  To leave or to stay?: Battered women's concern for vulnerable pets.

Authors:  Catherine A Faver; Elizabeth B Strand
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2003-12

Review 3.  Intimate partner homicide: review and implications of research and policy.

Authors:  Jacquelyn C Campbell; Nancy Glass; Phyllis W Sharps; Kathryn Laughon; Tina Bloom
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2007-07

4.  Deaths from violence in North Carolina, 2004: how deaths differ in females and males.

Authors:  C Sanford; S W Marshall; S L Martin; T Coyne-Beasley; A E Waller; P J Cook; T Norwood; Z Demissie
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.

Authors:  R J Sampson; S W Raudenbush; F Earls
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Social context of sexual relationships among rural African Americans.

Authors:  A A Adimora; V J Schoenbach; F E Martinson; K H Donaldson; R E Fullilove; S O Aral
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Average cost per person victimized by an intimate partner of the opposite gender: a comparison of men and women.

Authors:  Ileana Arias; Phaedra Corso
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2005-08

8.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

9.  A practical approach to public health surveillance of violent deaths related to intimate partner relationships.

Authors:  Brian J Biroscak; Patricia K Smith; Lori A Post
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Neighborhood poverty as a predictor of intimate partner violence among White, Black, and Hispanic couples in the United States: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  C B Cunradi; R Caetano; C Clark; J Schafer
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.797

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Characteristics of the residential neighborhood environment differentiate intimate partner femicide in urban versus rural settings.

Authors:  Kirsten M M Beyer; Peter M Layde; L Kevin Hamberger; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Violence victimization of young men in heterosexual relationships: does alcohol outlet density influence outcomes?

Authors:  Martha W Waller; Bonita J Iritani; Robert L Flewelling; Sharon L Christ; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Kathryn E Moracco
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2012

3.  Does neighborhood environment differentiate intimate partner femicides from other femicides?

Authors:  Kirsten M M Beyer; Peter M Layde; L Kevin Hamberger; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2014-12-24

4.  Perpetration of intimate partner violence by young adult males: the association with alcohol outlet density and drinking behavior.

Authors:  Martha W Waller; Bonita J Iritani; Sharon L Christ; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Kathryn E Moracco; Robert L Flewelling
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Troubled times, troubled relationships: how economic resources, gender beliefs, and neighborhood disadvantage influence intimate partner violence.

Authors:  Shelley D Golden; Krista M Perreira; Christine Piette Durrance
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2013-01-08

Review 6.  Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten Beyer; Anne Baber Wallis; L Kevin Hamberger
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2013-12-26

7.  Socio-demographic and psychosocial characteristics of male and female perpetrators in intimate partner homicide: A case-control study from Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.

Authors:  Linnea Carlsson; Henrik Lysell; Viveka Enander; Karin Örmon; Solveig Lövestad; Gunilla Krantz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.