Literature DB >> 20564621

Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Surena F Matin1, Vitaly Margulis, Ashish Kamat, Christopher G Wood, H Barton Grossman, Gordon A Brown, Colin P N Dinney, Randall Millikan, Arlene O Siefker-Radtke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the incidence of pathologic downstaging and complete remission (CR) in patients with high-grade ureteral and renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) (upper tract TCC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.
METHODS: The study group comprised patients with biopsy-demonstrated, high-grade disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by nephrouterectomy from 2004 to 2008, during which time patients uniformly were considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The control group comprised patients with biopsy-demonstrated, high-grade disease who underwent initial nephroureterectomy from 1993 to 2004, when patients uniformly underwent initial surgery. Multiple clinical and pathologic features were evaluated, and the primary endpoint was pathologic tumor classification.
RESULTS: One hundred seven patients in the control group underwent initial surgery, and 43 patients in the study group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Baseline demographics were similar between the groups except for a higher rate of sessile tumor architecture in the study group (72.1% vs 49.5%; P = .018). There was significant downstaging in study group patients compared with the historic control group (P = .004). The incidence of tumors classified as pathologic T2 (pT2) or as pT3 or higher was significantly lower in the study group (pT2, 65.4% vs 48.8%; P = .043; pT3 or higher, 47.7% vs 27.9%; P = .029). Fourteen percent of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a pathologic CR.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a 14% CR rate and a significant rate of downstaging. While longer follow-up is awaited for survival data to mature, the current data provide justification for the sustained support of trials using this strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20564621     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  57 in total

Review 1.  [Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. An update on clinical and pathological prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Optimal Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: an Unmet Need.

Authors:  Mounsif Azizi; Salim K Cheriyan; Charles C Peyton; Beat Foerster; Shahrokh F Shariat; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

5.  Systemic chemotherapy and radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Syed M Jafri; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Tumour architecture, grade and location remain predictors of non-organ-confined upper tract urothelial carcinoma at time of radical nephroureterectomy: results from a multicenter Norwegian external validation study.

Authors:  Bjarte Almås; Stein Øverby; Ole J Halvorsen; Lars A R Reisæter; Jørg Assmus; Birgitte Carlsen; Anders Loe; Christian Beisland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Perioperative chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Atiqullah Aziz; Jakub Dobruch; Kees Hendricksen; Luis A Kluth; Andrea Necchi; Aidan Noon; Michael Rink; Florian Roghmann; Roland Seiler; Paolo Gontero; Wassim Kassouf; Shahrokh F Shariat; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Vitaly Margulis; Maneka Puligandla; Edouard J Trabulsi; Elizabeth R Plimack; Elizabeth R Kessler; Surena F Matin; Guilherme Godoy; Ajjai Alva; Noah M Hahn; Michael A Carducci; Jean Hoffman-Censits
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Influence of preoperative factors on the oncologic outcome for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Sophie Hurel; Morgan Rouprêt; Thomas Seisen; Eva Comperat; Véronique Phé; Stéphane Droupy; François Audenet; Géraldine Pignot; Xavier Cathelineau; Laurent Guy; Olivier Cussenot; Adil Ouzzane; Gregory Bozzini; Laurent Nison; Alain Ruffion; Pierre Colin
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Significance of multiple preoperative laboratory abnormalities as prognostic indicators in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract following radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Masatomo Nishikawa; Hideaki Miyake; Toshifumi Kurahashi; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.